...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Equity, privatization and cost recovery in urban health care: the case of Lao PDR.
【24h】

Equity, privatization and cost recovery in urban health care: the case of Lao PDR.

机译:城市医疗保健中的公平,私有化和成本回收:以老挝为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Along with the shift from a planned to market-oriented economy, as in many other developing countries, Lao PDR has promoted health care partnerships with the private sector, and cost recovery in public hospitals, to increase resources in the public sector, while at the same time attempting to ensure appropriate access to health care for those without means to pay. In a multi-case design, this study compares two neighbourhoods of different socioeconomic status comprising 10 households, representing urban districts in three provinces. In-depth interviews were conducted over a 1-year period with three visits to each household. Members of the households were interviewed on their perceptions and utilization of health care services. Focus group discussions of public providers and individual interviews of private providers, leaders of the villages and hospital administrators provided complementary perspectives. The study found that both socioeconomic groups utilized private health services as their first choice, including private clinics and treatment abroad for those with high socioeconomic status, while the low socioeconomic group preferred private pharmacies. The unwelcoming attitudes of health staff and procedural barriers have led both groups to meet their health care needs in the private sector. Here the health care they receive is strictly limited to what they can pay for. For the poor, in most cases, this means drugs alone, i.e. no examination, no diagnosis and only limited advice. Limited financial resources often means receiving inappropriate and insufficient medication. Equity in health care remains theoretical rather than practical and the social goals of the reform have not been achieved.
机译:与许多其他发展中国家一样,随着从计划经济向市场经济的转变,老挝人民民主共和国促进了与私营部门的医疗保健伙伴关系,以及公立医院的成本回收,以增加公共部门的资源。同时试图确保那些无力支付的人获得适当的医疗服务。在多案例设计中,本研究比较了具有不同社会经济地位的两个社区,包括10个家庭,代表了三个省的市区。在为期一年的时间内进行了深入访谈,每个家庭进行了三次访问。对家庭成员进行了访谈,了解他们对医疗服务的看法和利用情况。对公共提供者的焦点小组讨论以及对私人提供者,村庄的领导者和医院管理者的个人访谈提供了互补的观点。该研究发现,这两个社会经济团体都将私人卫生服务作为他们的首选,包括社会诊所地位高的人的私人诊所和国外治疗,而社会经济地位低的团体则首选私人药房。医护人员的不受欢迎态度和程序上的障碍导致这两个群体都满足了他们在私营部门的医疗保健需求。在这里,他们所获得的医疗保健严格限于他们所能支付的费用。对于穷人而言,在大多数情况下,这意味着仅使用药物,即不进行检查,不进行诊断并且仅提供有限的建议。有限的财务资源通常意味着接受不合适和不足的药物。卫生保健方面的公平仍然是理论上的,而不是实践上的,改革的社会目标尚未实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号