...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Out-of-pocket costs for facility-based maternity care in three African countries.
【24h】

Out-of-pocket costs for facility-based maternity care in three African countries.

机译:三个非洲国家以设施为基础的产妇保健的自付费用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE To estimate out-of-pocket medical expenses to women and families for maternity care at all levels of the health system in Burkina Faso, Kenya and Tanzania. METHODS In a population-based survey in 2003, 6345 women who had given birth in the previous 24 months were interviewed about the costs incurred during childbirth. Three years later, in 2006, an additional 8302 women with recent deliveries were interviewed in the same districts to explore their maternity care-seeking experiences and associated costs. FINDINGS: The majority of women interviewed reported paying out-of-pocket costs for facility-based deliveries. Out-of-pocket costs were highest in Kenya (a mean of USDollars 18.4 for normal and complicated deliveries), where 98% of women who delivered in a health facility had to pay some fees. In Burkina Faso, 92% of women reported paying some fees (mean of USDollars 7.9). Costs were lowest in Tanzania, where 91% of women reported paying some fees (mean of USDollars 5.1). In all three countries, women in the poorest wealth quintile did not pay significantly less for maternity costs than the wealthiest women. Costs for complicated delivery were double those for normal delivery in Burkina Faso and Kenya, and represented more than 16% of mean monthly household income in Burkina Faso, and 35% in Kenya. In Tanzania and Burkina Faso most institutional births were at mid-level government health facilities (health centres or dispensaries). In contrast, in Kenya, 42% of births were at government hospitals, and 28% were at private or mission facilities, contributing to the overall higher costs in this country compared with Burkina Faso and Tanzania. However, among women delivering in government health facilities in Kenya, reported out-of-pocket costs were significantly lower in 2006 than in 2003, indicating that a 2004 national policy eliminating user fees at mid- and lower-level government health facilities was having some impact.
机译:目的估算在布基纳法索,肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚各级卫生系统中用于妇女和家庭的产妇医疗费用。方法在2003年的一项基于人口的调查中,对6345名在过去24个月内分娩过的妇女进行了访谈,以了解他们在分娩过程中产生的费用。三年后,即2006年,又在同一地区对另外8302名刚分娩的妇女进行了采访,以探讨她们寻求产妇的经历和相关费用。结果:接受采访的大多数妇女报告说,他们为设施分娩支付了自付费用。肯尼亚的自付费用最高(正常和复杂分娩的平均费用为18.4美元),在卫生机构分娩的妇女中有98%必须支付一定的费用。在布基纳法索,有92%的妇女报告支付了一些费用(平均USDollars 7.9)。坦桑尼亚的费用最低,该地区91%的妇女报告要支付一定的费用(平均水平为5.1美元)。在这三个国家中,最贫穷的五分之一人口中的妇女支付的生育费用并没有比最富有的妇女低很多。复杂分娩的费用是布基纳法索和肯尼亚正常分娩费用的两倍,占布基纳法索平均月收入的16%以上,在肯尼亚为35%。在坦桑尼亚和布基纳法索,大多数机构出生在政府的中级卫生机构(卫生中心或药房)。相反,在肯尼亚,与布基纳法索和坦桑尼亚相比,肯尼亚42%的分娩是在政府医院分娩的,而28%的分娩是在私人或传教机构的分娩,这导致该国的总体费用更高。但是,在肯尼亚政府医疗机构分娩的妇女中,据报告2006年的自付费用比2003年明显降低,这表明2004年取消中,低级政府医疗机构使用费的国家政策中有一些影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号