首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Policy and Planning >Out-of-pocket costs for facility-based maternity care in three African countries
【2h】

Out-of-pocket costs for facility-based maternity care in three African countries

机译:三个非洲国家基于设施的孕产妇保健的自付费用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To estimate out-of-pocket medical expenses to women and families for maternity care at all levels of the health system in Burkina Faso, Kenya and Tanzania.>Methods In a population-based survey in 2003, 6345 women who had given birth in the previous 24 months were interviewed about the costs incurred during childbirth. Three years later, in 2006, an additional 8302 women with recent deliveries were interviewed in the same districts to explore their maternity care-seeking experiences and associated costs.>Findings The majority of women interviewed reported paying out-of-pocket costs for facility-based deliveries. Out-of-pocket costs were highest in Kenya (a mean of US$18.4 for normal and complicated deliveries), where 98% of women who delivered in a health facility had to pay some fees. In Burkina Faso, 92% of women reported paying some fees (mean of US$7.9). Costs were lowest in Tanzania, where 91% of women reported paying some fees (mean of US$5.1). In all three countries, women in the poorest wealth quintile did not pay significantly less for maternity costs than the wealthiest women. Costs for complicated delivery were double those for normal delivery in Burkina Faso and Kenya, and represented more than 16% of mean monthly household income in Burkina Faso, and 35% in Kenya. In Tanzania and Burkina Faso most institutional births were at mid-level government health facilities (health centres or dispensaries). In contrast, in Kenya, 42% of births were at government hospitals, and 28% were at private or mission facilities, contributing to the overall higher costs in this country compared with Burkina Faso and Tanzania. However, among women delivering in government health facilities in Kenya, reported out-of-pocket costs were significantly lower in 2006 than in 2003, indicating that a 2004 national policy eliminating user fees at mid- and lower-level government health facilities was having some impact.
机译:>目的,以估算在布基纳法索,肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚各级卫生系统中用于妇女和家庭的产妇医疗费用。>方法根据2003年的一项调查,对在过去24个月内分娩的6345名妇女进行了访谈,以了解他们在分娩过程中产生的费用。三年后的2006年,又在同一地区对8302名刚分娩的妇女进行了访谈,以探讨她们的寻求产妇护理的经历和相关费用。>发现 -基于设施的交付的零用钱。肯尼亚的自付费用最高(正常分娩和复杂分娩的平均费用为18.4美元),在卫生机构分娩的妇女中有98%必须支付一些费用。在布基纳法索,有92%的妇女报告支付了一些费用(平均7.9美元)。成本最低的是坦桑尼亚,其中91%的妇女报告说要支付一些费用(平均5.1美元)。在这三个国家中,最贫穷的五分之一人口中的妇女所支付的生育费用并没有比最富有的妇女低很多。复杂分娩的费用是布基纳法索和肯尼亚正常分娩费用的两倍,占布基纳法索平均家庭月收入的16%以上,在肯尼亚为35%。在坦桑尼亚和布基纳法索,大多数机构出生在政府的中级卫生机构(卫生中心或药房)。相比之下,在肯尼亚,与布基纳法索和坦桑尼亚相比,该国42%的分娩是在政府医院分娩的,而28%的分娩是在私人或传教机构的分摊,这导致该国的总体费用更高。但是,在肯尼亚政府医疗机构分娩的妇女中,据报告2006年的自付费用比2003年低得多,这表明2004年取消中,低级政府医疗机构使用费的国家政策中有一些影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号