...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Capacity building for global health diplomacy: Thailand's experience of trade and health
【24h】

Capacity building for global health diplomacy: Thailand's experience of trade and health

机译:全球卫生外交能力建设:泰国的贸易与卫生经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A rapid expansion of trade liberalization in Thailand during the 1990s raised a critical question for policy transparency from various stakeholders. Particular attention was paid to a bilateral trade negotiation between Thailand and USA concerned with the impact of the 'Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Rights (TRIPS) plus' provisions on access to medicines. Other trade liberalization effects on health were also concerning health actors. In response, a number of interagency committees were established to engage with trade negotiations. In this respect, Thailand is often cited as a positive example of a country that has proactively sought, and achieved, trade and health policy coherence. This article investigates this relationship in more depth and suggests lessons for wider study and application of global health diplomacy (GHD). This study involved semi-structured interviews with 20 people involved in trade-related health negotiations, together with observation of 9 meetings concerning trade-related health issues. Capacity to engage with trade negotiations appears to have been developed by health actors through several stages; starting from the Individual (I) understanding of trade effects on health, through Nodes (N) that establish the mechanisms to enhance health interests, Networks (N) to advocate for health within these negotiations, and an Enabling environment (E) to retain health officials and further strengthen their capacities to deal with trade-related health issues. This INNE model seems to have worked well in Thailand. However, other contextual factors are also significant. This article suggests that, in building capacity in GHD, it is essential to educate both health and non-health actors on global health issues and to use a combination of formal and informal mechanisms to participate in GHD. And in developing sustainable capacity in GHD, it requires long term commitment and strong leadership from both health and non-health sectors.
机译:1990年代泰国贸易自由化的迅速扩大,引起了各利益相关方对政策透明性的关键问题。特别关注了泰国和美国之间的双边贸易谈判,涉及“与贸易有关的知识产权(TRIPS)附加条款”对获取药品的影响。贸易自由化对健康的其他影响也涉及健康参与者。作为回应,建立了一些机构间委员会来参与贸易谈判。在这方面,泰国经常被视为一个积极寻求并实现贸易和卫生政策一致性的国家的积极榜样。本文将对这种关系进行更深入的研究,并为更广泛的研究和应用全球卫生外交(GHD)提供经验教训。这项研究涉及对参与贸易相关健康谈判的20人进行半结构化访谈,并观察了9次有关贸易相关健康问题的会议。卫生行为者似乎已经通过几个阶段发展了参与贸易谈判的能力;从个人(I)对贸易对健康的影响的理解开始,通过建立增强健康利益的机制的节点(N),在这些谈判中倡导健康的网络(N)和保持健康的有利环境(E)官员,并进一步加强其处理与贸易有关的健康问题的能力。这种INNE模型在泰国似乎效果很好。但是,其他上下文因素也很重要。本文建议,在建立GHD的能力时,必须对健康和非健康行为者进行全球健康问题教育,并使用正式和非正式机制相结合来参与GHD。在发展GHD的可持续能力时,它需要卫生和非卫生部门的长期承诺和强有力的领导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号