首页> 外文期刊>Health policy >Does deregulation in community pharmacy impact accessibility of medicines, quality of pharmacy services and costs? Evidence from nine European countries
【24h】

Does deregulation in community pharmacy impact accessibility of medicines, quality of pharmacy services and costs? Evidence from nine European countries

机译:社区药房的放松管制是否会影响药品的可及性,药房服务的质量和成本?来自九个欧洲国家的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To analyse the impact of deregulation in community pharmacy on accessibility of medicines, quality of pharmacy services and costs. Methods: We analysed and compared community pharmacy systems in five rather deregulated countries (England, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden) and four rather regulated countries (Austria, Denmark, Finland, Spain). Data were collected by literature review, a questionnaire survey and interviews. Results: Following a deregulation, several new pharmacies and dispensaries of Over-the-Counter (OTC) medicines tended to be established, predominantly in urban areas. Unless prevented by regulation, specific stakeholders, e.g. wholesalers, were seen to gain market dominance which limited envisaged competition. There were indications for an increased workload for pharmacists in some deregulated countries. Economic pressure to increase the pharmacy turnover through the sale of OTC medicines and non-pharmaceuticals was observed in deregulated and regulated countries. Prices of OTC medicines were not found to decrease after a deregulation in pharmacy. Conclusions: Access to pharmacies usually increases after a deregulation but this is likely to favour urban populations with already good accessibility. Policy-makers are recommended to take action to ensure equitable accessibility and sustainable competition in a more deregulated environment. No association between pharmaceutical expenditure and the extent of regulation/deregulation appears to exist.
机译:目的:分析社区药房放松管制对药品可及性,药房服务质量和成本的影响。方法:我们分析并比较了五个管制较弱的国家(英格兰,爱尔兰,荷兰,挪威,瑞典)和四个管制较严的国家(奥地利,丹麦,芬兰,西班牙)的社区药房系统。通过文献回顾,问卷调查和访谈收集数据。结果:放松管制后,倾向于在城市地区建立一些新的非处方药(OTC)药房和药房。除非法规禁止,否则特定的利益相关者,例如批发商被认为获得了市场主导地位,从而限制了预期的竞争。有迹象表明,在一些放松管制的国家,药剂师的工作量增加了。在放松管制的国家中,观察到了通过销售非处方药和非药品来增加药房营业额的经济压力。在药店放松管制后,未发现非处方药的价格下降。结论:放松管制后,通常会增加对药房的访问,但这可能会有利于已经具有良好可及性的城市人口。建议政策制定者采取行动,以确保在更加放松管制的环境中公平获得服务和可持续竞争。药品支出与监管/解除授权范围之间似乎不存在关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号