首页> 外文期刊>Health policy >Efficiency, equity and feasibility of strategies to identify the poor: an application to premium exemptions under National Health Insurance in Ghana.
【24h】

Efficiency, equity and feasibility of strategies to identify the poor: an application to premium exemptions under National Health Insurance in Ghana.

机译:识别贫困者的策略的效率,公平性和可行性:加纳国家健康保险项下的保费豁免申请。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This paper outlines the potential strategies to identify the poor, and assesses their feasibility, efficiency and equity. Analyses are illustrated for the case of premium exemptions under National Health Insurance (NHI) in Ghana. METHODS: A literature search in Medline search was performed to identify strategies to identify the poor. Models were developed including information on demography and poverty, and costs and errors of in- and exclusion of these strategies in two regions in Ghana. RESULTS: Proxy means testing (PMT), participatory welfare ranking (PWR), and geographic targeting (GT) are potentially useful strategies to identify the poor, and vary in terms of their efficiency, equity and feasibility. Costs to exempt one poor individual range between USDollars 11.63 and USDollars 66.67, and strategies may exclude up to 25% of the poor. Feasibility of strategies is dependent on their aptness in rural/urban settings, and administrative capacity to implement. A decision framework summarizes the above information to guide policy making. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend PMT as an optimal strategy in relative low poverty incidence urbanized settings, PWR as an optimal strategy in relative low poverty incidence rural settings, and GT as an optimal strategy in high incidence poverty settings. This paper holds important lessons not only for NHI in Ghana but also for other countries implementing exemption policies.
机译:目标:本文概述了识别贫困者的潜在策略,并评估了其可行性,效率和公平性。对加纳国家健康保险(NHI)下保费豁免的案例进行了分析。方法:在Medline搜索中进行文献搜索,以确定识别贫困者的策略。在加纳的两个地区开发了模型,其中包括有关人口统计学和贫困的信息,以及这些战略的内外成本和成本误差。结果:代理人均值测试(PMT),参与性福利等级(PWR)和地理定位(GT)是识别贫困者的潜在有用策略,并且在效率,公平性和可行性方面各不相同。豁免一名贫困个人的成本在USDollars 11.63和USDollars 66.67之间,而策略可能会排除多达25%的贫困人口。战略的可行性取决于其在农村/城市环境中的适用性以及执行的行政能力。决策框架汇总了以上信息以指导决策。结论:我们建议在相对低贫困发生率的城市化环境中,将PMT作为最佳策略,将PWR作为相对低贫困发生率的农村环境中的最佳策略,将GT作为高发生率贫困环境的最佳策略。本文不仅为加纳的国民健康保险提供了重要的教训,也为其他实施豁免政策的国家提供了重要的教训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号