首页> 外文期刊>Hepatology: Official Journal of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases >Left-liver hypertrophy after therapeutic right-liver radioembolization is substantial but less than after portal vein embolization
【24h】

Left-liver hypertrophy after therapeutic right-liver radioembolization is substantial but less than after portal vein embolization

机译:治疗性右肝放射性栓塞后左肝肥大,但比门静脉栓塞后少

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In patients with liver malignancies potentially amenable to curative extended right hepatectomy but insufficient size of the future liver remnant (FLR), portal vein embolization (PVE) of the tumor-bearing liver is used to induce contralateral liver hypertrophy but leaves the tumor untreated. Radioembolization (RE) treats the tumor in the embolized lobe along with contralateral hypertrophy induction. We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare the capacity for hypertrophy induction of these two modalities. Patients with right-hepatic secondary liver malignancies with no or negligible left-hepatic tumor involvement who were treated by right-lobar PVE (n=141) or RE (n=35) at two centers were matched for criteria known to influence liver regeneration following PVE: 1) baseline FLR/Total liver volume ratio (<25 versus ≥25%); 2) prior platinum-containing systemic chemotherapy; 3) embolization of segments 5-8 versus 4-8; and 4) baseline platelet count (<200 versus ≥200 Gpt/L).The primary endpoint was relative change in FLR volume from baseline to follow-up. Twenty-six matched pairs were identified. FLR volume increase from baseline to follow-up (median 33 [24-56] days after PVE or 46 [27-79] days after RE) was significant in both groups but PVE produced significantly more FLR hypertrophy than RE (61.5 versus 29%, P<0.001). Time between treatment and follow-up was not correlated with the degree of contralateral hypertrophy achieved in both groups. Although group differences in patient history and treatment setting were present and some bias cannot be excluded, this was minimized by the matched-pair design, as remaining group differences after matching were found to have no significant influence on contralateral hypertrophy development. Conclusion: PVE induces significantly more contralateral hypertrophy than RE with therapeutic (nonlobectomy) doses. However, contralateral hypertrophy induced by RE is substantial and RE minimizes the risk of tumor progression in the treated lobe, possibly making it a suitable modality for selected patients.
机译:对于可能适合治愈性右大肝切除术但未来肝残余(FLR)大小不足的肝恶性肿瘤患者,使用荷瘤肝的门静脉栓塞术(PVE)诱发对侧肝肥大,但未治疗肿瘤。放射栓塞(RE)与对侧肥大诱导一起治疗栓塞肺叶中的肿瘤。我们进行了配对分析以比较这两种方式对肥大的诱导能力。在两个中心接受右叶PVE(n = 141)或RE(n = 35)治疗的无或无左肝肿瘤累及的右肝继发性肝恶性肿瘤患者符合已知的影响以下肝再生的标准PVE:1)基线FLR /总肝脏体积比(<25 vs≥25%); 2)先前的含铂全身化疗; 3)段5-8对4-8的栓塞; 4)基线血小板计数(<200 vs≥200Gpt / L)。主要终点是从基线到随访的FLR量的相对变化。确定了二十六个匹配对。两组从基线到随访(PVE后第33 [24-56]天或RE后46 [27-79]天的中位数)的FLR体积增加均显着,但PVE产生的FLR肥大比RE多得多(61.5对29% ,P <0.001)。治疗和随访之间的时间与两组对侧肥大程度无关。尽管存在患者病史和治疗环境的群体差异,并且不能排除某些偏倚,但通过配对设计将其最小化,因为发现匹配后剩余的群体差异对对侧肥大的发展没有显着影响。结论:PVE引起的对侧肥大明显大于RE(非肺叶切除术)剂量。然而,RE引起的对侧肥大是实质性的,并且RE使治疗的叶中肿瘤进展的风险最小化,可能使其成为选定患者的合适方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号