首页> 外文期刊>Health >'Hell no, they'll think you're mad as a hatter': Illness discourses and their implications for patients in mental health practice
【24h】

'Hell no, they'll think you're mad as a hatter': Illness discourses and their implications for patients in mental health practice

机译:“不,他们会以为您是疯子”:疾​​病话题及其对患者心理健康的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines how discourses on mental illness are negotiated in mental health practice and their implications for the subjective experiences of psychiatric patients. Based on a Foucauldian analysis of ethnographic data from two mental health institutions in Denmarkan outpatient clinic and an inpatient wardthis article identifies three discourses in the institutions: the instability discourse, the discourse of really ill, and the lack of insight discourse. This article indicates that patients were required to develop a finely tuned and precise sense of the discourses and ways to appear in front of professionals if they wished to have a say in their treatment. We suggest that the extent to which an individual patient was positioned as ill seemed to rely more on his or her ability to navigate the discourses and the psychiatric setting than on any objective diagnostic criteria. Thus, we argue that illness discourses in mental health practice are not just materialized as static biomedical understandings, but are complex and diverseand have implications for patients' possibilities to understand themselves and become understandable to professionals.
机译:本文探讨了在精神卫生实践中如何讨论精神疾病的话语及其对精神病患者主观体验的影响。基于对丹麦两家门诊诊所和住院病房中两个精神卫生机构的人种学数据进行的Foucauldian分析,本文确定了机构中的三种话语:不稳定话语,生病话语和缺乏洞察力话语。本文指出,如果患者希望在治疗中拥有发言权,则需要对患者的话语和出现在专业人员面前的方式进行微调和精确的感知。我们建议,单个患者患病的程度似乎更多地取决于他或她对话语和精神病学环境的适应能力,而不是任何客观的诊断标准。因此,我们认为,心理健康实践中的疾病话语不仅是作为静态的生物医学理解而具体化的,而且是复杂而多样的,并且对患者了解自己并为专业人员所理解的可能性具有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号