首页> 外文期刊>Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society >Temporary left ventricular stimulation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock and asynchronous left ventricular contraction: A safety and feasibility study
【24h】

Temporary left ventricular stimulation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock and asynchronous left ventricular contraction: A safety and feasibility study

机译:难治性心源性休克和异步左心室收缩患者的临时左心室刺激:安全性和可行性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Despite modern treatment strategies, cardiogenic shock (CS) is still associated with high mortality. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of temporary percutaneous left ventricular (LV) stimulation as rescue therapy in patients with CS refractory to standard clinical care. Methods: Consecutive patients with deteriorating CS without further treatment options received transjugular placement of a temporary LV lead if they exhibited signs of asynchronous LV contraction. To maintain atrioventricular synchronous contraction, an additional right atrial lead was placed in patients with sinus rhythm. The leads were externally connected to a conventional pacemaker. Hemodynamic course, clinical outcome, and adverse events were assessed. Results: A total of 15 patients [ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 8), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 6), and acute myocarditis (n = 1)] underwent successful lead placement. Median procedure and fluoroscopy times measured 60 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 55-90) and 12 minutes (IQR 7-34), respectively. Ten patients (67%) acutely responded by improvement of hemodynamic parameters with simultaneous reduction of catecholamine support. Catecholamine therapy was discontinued after a median of 28 hours (IQR 16-60). The temporary leads were removed after a median of 6 days (IQR 3-10). Total in-hospital mortality was 47%, measuring 80% in nonresponders and 30% in responders (P =.119). There was no therapy-related serious adverse event. Conclusions: Our data indicate that there may be a role for temporary LV stimulation as rescue therapy in selected patients with refractory CS. In clinical situations where aggressive therapies are used for urgent hemodynamic stabilization, temporary LV stimulation may evolve as a further and less invasive treatment option.
机译:背景:尽管采用了现代治疗策略,但心源性休克(CS)仍与高死亡率相关。目的:评估临时性经皮左心室(LV)刺激作为CS难治性标准临床护理患者的可行性和安全性。方法:连续性CS恶化且无进一步治疗选择的患者,如果表现出异步LV收缩征象,则应经颈静脉放置临时LV导线。为了维持房室同步收缩,在窦性心律患者中再加一条右心房导联。导线从外部连接到常规起搏器。评估血流动力学过程,临床结局和不良事件。结果:总共15例患者[缺血性心肌病(n = 8),扩张型心肌病(n = 6)和急性心肌炎(n = 1)]成功完成了导线放置。中位程序和荧光检查时间分别为60分钟(四分位间距[IQR] 55-90)和12分钟(IQR 7-34)。十名患者(67%)通过改善血流动力学参数并同时减少儿茶酚胺支持来急性缓解。中位数28小时后中断儿茶酚胺治疗(IQR 16-60)。中位数为6天(IQR 3-10)后,将临时引线移除。住院总死亡率为47%,无反应者为80%,有反应者为30%(P = .119)。没有与治疗有关的严重不良事件。结论:我们的数据表明,在部分难治性CS患者中,暂时性LV刺激可能会作为抢救疗法发挥作用。在使用积极疗法进行紧急血流动力学稳定的临床情况下,临时性左室刺激可能会演变为一种更具侵入性的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号