...
首页> 外文期刊>Helicobacter >Quadruple Therapy with Medications Containing Either Rufloxacin or Furazolidone as a Rescue regimen in the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori-Infected Dyspepsia Patients: A Randomized Pilot Study
【24h】

Quadruple Therapy with Medications Containing Either Rufloxacin or Furazolidone as a Rescue regimen in the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori-Infected Dyspepsia Patients: A Randomized Pilot Study

机译:包含卢氟沙星或呋喃唑酮作为抢救方案的药物的四联疗法在幽门螺杆菌感染的消化不良患者的治疗中:一项随机对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The eradication rates of first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection are not satisfactory. Various regimens including quadruple therapies have been recommended as rescue therapies after the first H. pylori eradication attempt failed. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety between quadruple therapies with medications containing either rufloxacin or levofloxacin in the Chinese nonulcer dyspepsia patients infected with H. pylori. Methods: One hundred and thirty-eight patients after an unsuccessful 10-day standard triple therapy were enrolled in this study. They were randomized to receive a 14-day quadruple therapy with pantoprazole, bismuth citrate, and furazolidone in combination with either rufloxacin (Group Ruf, n = 70) or levofloxacin (Group Lev, n = 68). The H. pylori eradication was evaluated by ~(13)C-urea breath test 4 and 12 weeks after therapy was completed. Results: One hundred and twenty-seven patients (65 in Group Ruf and 62 in Group Lev) completed the study. The H. pylori eradication rates in Group Ruf were 81.4% for intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 87.7% for perprotocol (PP) analysis. The rates were statistically significantly higher than those in Group Lev (66.2% and 72.6%) (p < 0.05). There were no severe adverse effects found in these two groups. Conclusions: Fourteen-day quadruple therapy with a combination of proton- pump inhibitor, bismuth citrate, furazolidone, and rufloxacin is considered an effective and safe rescue therapy for H. pylori eradication after failure of standard triple treatment.
机译:背景:幽门螺杆菌感染一线治疗的根除率不令人满意。在首次根除幽门螺杆菌的尝试失败后,已建议采用包括四联疗法在内的各种方案作为抢救疗法。目的:比较四联疗法与含鲁氟沙星或左氧氟沙星的药物对感染幽门螺杆菌的中国非溃疡性消化不良患者的疗效和安全性。方法:本研究纳入了10天标准三联疗法失败后的138例患者。他们被随机分配接受pan托拉唑,柠檬酸铋和呋喃唑酮联合鲁氟沙星(Ruf组,n = 70)或左氧氟沙星(lev组,n = 68)的14天四联疗法。治疗结束后第4周和第12周,通过〜(13)C-尿素呼气试验评估幽门螺杆菌的根除情况。结果:127位患者(Ruf组为65位,Luv组为62位)完成了研究。意向性治疗(ITT)分析中Ruf组的幽门螺杆菌根除率为81.4%,全方案(PP)分析为87.7%。发生率在统计学上显着高于Lev组(分别为66.2%和72.6%)(p <0.05)。两组均未发现严重不良反应。结论:结合质子泵抑制剂,柠檬酸铋,呋喃唑酮和鲁氟沙星的14天四联疗法被认为是标准三联疗法失败后根除幽门螺杆菌的一种有效且安全的挽救疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号