首页> 外文期刊>Helgoland marine research >Sieving alive or after fixation:effects of sieving procedure on macrobenthic diversity,density and community structure
【24h】

Sieving alive or after fixation:effects of sieving procedure on macrobenthic diversity,density and community structure

机译:活着或固定后筛分:筛分程序对大型底栖动物多样性,密度和群落结构的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although combining datasets is often needed to unravel large-scale or long-term patterns in benthos ecology,this is frequently hampered by differences in technical design of the individual studies.One element that often vary among macrobenthic studies is the sieving procedure:sieving alive versus sieving after fixation.This study therefore aimed at the qualification and quantification of the impact of sieving procedure,using a 1 mm mesh sized sieve,at three levels of ecological organisation:(1) diversity,(2) species and taxon density,and (3) community structure.To include a maximum suite of macrobenthic species and to evaluate the community-specific effects,the impact of sieving procedure was investigated within four widely spread macrobenthos communities in the Belgian part of the North Sea.Sieving alive negatively impacted all tested diversity measures (S,N1;N2,N_(infinity),H',ES_(100) and J'):community-dependent relative losses of up to 35% were observed.However,most trends were ambiguous and statistically non-significant.Community-and taxon-dependent impacts were detected at the level of density.Mainly polychaetes were found to be negatively impacted by sieving alive (relative losses maximum 81%):especially small,interstitial polychaetes (e.g.Hesionura elongata and Spio filicornis) tend to actively escape from the sieve (relative loss up to 100%).Next to size,also behaviour,the presence of head appendages,the depth of the sampling stations and sampling season are believed to influence the sieving procedure impact.While detailed community composition was impacted (ANOSIM dissimilarity:maximum 85%),no major impact on the differentiation between the investigated communities was detected.The present study thus demonstrated that combining data,retrieved with a different sieving procedure can be useful,but its reliability will mainly depend on the type of questions one wants to answer.In all cases caution at all levels of ecological organisation is advised.
机译:尽管通常需要结合数据集来揭示底栖生物生态学中的大规模或长期模式,但这经常因各个研究的技术设计差异而受到阻碍。大型底栖动物研究中经常发生变化的一个因素是筛分程序:活着筛分与动态筛分因此,本研究旨在使用1毫米筛目大小的筛子在三个生态组织级别上对筛分程序的影响进行鉴定和量化:(1)多样性,(2)种类和分类群密度,以及( 3)群落结构。为了包括最大的大型底栖动物种类并评估特定群落的影响,在北海比利时部分四个广泛分布的大型底栖动物群落中调查了筛分程序的影响。多样性测度(S,N1; N2,N_(无穷大),H',ES_(100)和J'):观察到与社区有关的相对损失高达35%。在密度水平上检测到与社区和分类群有关的影响。主要发现多毛cha被活着筛分(相对损失最大为81%)产生负面影响:尤其是小的,间质性多毛cha(例如Hesionura elongata)和螺旋螺)往往会从筛子中主动逃逸(相对损失高达100%)。除了尺寸,行为,头部附属物的存在,采样站的深度和采样季节还被认为会影响筛分程序的影响虽然详细的社区组成受到影响(ANOSIM相异性:最大85%),但未发现对所调查的社区之间的差异有重大影响。本研究因此证明,结合数据并采用不同的筛分程序进行检索是有用的,但其可靠性将主要取决于要回答的问题的类型。在所有情况下,都建议在生态组织的各个层面上保持谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号