...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Microbiological Methods >Effects of sieving, drying and rewetting upon soil bacterial community structure and respiration rates.
【24h】

Effects of sieving, drying and rewetting upon soil bacterial community structure and respiration rates.

机译:筛分,干燥和再润湿对土壤细菌群落结构和呼吸速率的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Soil microcosm studies often require some form of soil homogenisation, such as sieving, to provide a representative sample. Frequently, soils are also homogenised following drying and are then rewetted, yet little research has been done to understand how these methods impact upon microbial communities. Here we compared the molecular diversity and functional responses of intact cores from a Scottish grassland soil with homogenised samples prepared by drying, sieving and rewetting or freshly sieving wet soils. Results showed that there was no significant difference in total soil CO2-C efflux between the freshly sieved and intact core treatments, however, respiration was significantly higher in the dried and rewetted microcosms. Molecular fingerprinting (T-RFLP) of bacterial communities at two different time-points showed that both homogenisation methods significantly altered bacterial community structure with the largest differences being observed after drying and rewetting. Assessments of responsive taxa in each treatment showed that intact cores were dominated by Acidobacterial peaks whereas an increased relative abundance of Alphaproteobacterial terminal restriction fragments were apparent in both homogenised treatments. However, the shift in community structure was not as large in the freshly sieved soil. Our findings suggest that if soil homogenisation must be performed, then fresh sieving of wet soil is preferable to drying and rewetting in approximating the bacterial diversity and functioning of intact cores.
机译:土壤微观研究通常需要某种形式的土壤均质化,例如筛分,以提供代表性样品。通常,土壤在干燥后也会被均质化,然后被重新湿润,但很少有研究了解这些方法如何影响微生物群落。在这里,我们比较了苏格兰草原土壤完整核心的分子多样性和功能响应,以及通过干燥,过筛,再湿润或新鲜过筛湿土制备的均质样品。结果表明,新鲜筛分和完整芯处理之间的土壤总CO 2 -C外排量没有显着差异,但是在干燥和再湿润的微观世界中,呼吸作用显着更高。在两个不同的时间点,细菌群落的分子指纹图谱(T-RFLP)表明,两种均质化方法均会显着改变细菌群落的结构,在干燥和重新润湿后观察到最大的差异。对每种处理中反应性分类单元的评估表明,完整的核心被酸性细菌峰所支配,而在两种均质化处理中,α-变形细菌末端限制性片段的相对丰度却明显增加。但是,在刚过筛的土壤中,群落结构的变化并不那么大。我们的发现表明,如果必须进行土壤均质化,那么在接近细菌多样性和完整核心功能的情况下,湿筛的新鲜筛分比干燥和重新润湿要好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号