...
首页> 外文期刊>Health services research: HSR >Collecting patient race/ethnicity and primary language data in ambulatory care settings: a case study in methodology.
【24h】

Collecting patient race/ethnicity and primary language data in ambulatory care settings: a case study in methodology.

机译:在非卧床护理环境中收集患者种族/民族和主要语言数据:方法学案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To collect patient race/ethnicity and language (r/e/l) in an ambulatory care setting. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: The Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF), December 2006-May 2008. STUDY DESIGN: Three pilot studies: (1) Comparing mail versus telephone versus clinic visit questionnaire distribution; (2) comparing the front desk method (FDM) versus exam room method (ERM) in the clinic visit; and (3) determining resource allocation necessary for data entry. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Studies were planned and executed by PAMF's Quality and Planning division. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Collecting r/e/l data during clinic visits elicited the highest response rate. The FDM yielded higher response rate than the ERM. One full-time equivalent is initially necessary for data entry. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting sequential studies can help guide r/e/l collection in a short time frame.
机译:目的:在非卧床护理环境中收集患者的种族/民族和语言(r / e / l)。数据来源/研究背景:帕洛阿尔托医学基金会(PAMF),2006年12月至2008年5月。研究设计:三个试点研究:(1)比较邮件,电话与诊所访问问卷的分布; (2)在诊所就诊时比较前台方法(FDM)与检查室方法(ERM); (3)确定数据输入所需的资源分配。数据收集/提取方法:研究是由PAMF的质量和计划部门计划和执行的。主要发现:在诊所就诊期间收集r / e / l数据可得出最高的响应率。 FDM产生的响应率高于ERM。最初需要一个全时等效项才能输入数据。结论:进行顺序研究可以帮助指导在短时间内收集r / e / l。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号