首页> 外文期刊>Headache >The classification of chronic daily headache in adolescents-a comparison between the second edition of the international classification of headache disorders and alternative diagnostic criteria.
【24h】

The classification of chronic daily headache in adolescents-a comparison between the second edition of the international classification of headache disorders and alternative diagnostic criteria.

机译:青少年慢性每日头痛的分类-国际第二版头痛疾病分类和替代诊断标准之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives.-To compare the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-2) and the Silberstein-Lipton (S-L) criteria in the classification of adolescents with chronic daily headache (CDH). Methods.-We reviewed the clinical records and the headache diaries of 170 adolescents (13 to 17 years) seen between 1998 and 2003 at a headache center. Relevant information was transferred to a standardized form that included operational criteria for the ICHD-2. CDH subtypes were classified according the criteria proposed by S-L into transformed migraine (TM) with (TM+) and without medication overuse (TM-), chronic tension-type headache (CTTH), new daily persistent headache (NDPH), and hemicrania continua (HC). Results.-From the 69 patients with TM- according the S-L criteria, most (71%) could be classified as chronic migraine (CM), while a minority of patients required a combination of diagnosis, mainly migraine and CTTH (14.4%). Of the patients with TM+, just 39.6% met the criteriafor probable CM (PCM) with probable medication overuse (PMO). If instead of 15 migraine days per month, we considered 15 or more days of migraine or probable migraine, 84% of the subjects with TM- and 68.7% of those with TM+ could be classified. Of the 27 subjects classified as NDPH without medication overuse according to the S-L system, the majority (51.2%) were also classified as NDPH according the ICHD-2. Interestingly, three (11.1% of the subjects with NDPH without medication overuse) were classified as CM in the ICHD-2 because these patients had an abrupt onset of 15 or more days of migraine per month. All patients with NDPH with medication overuse according to the S-L criteria required a combination of diagnoses in the ICHD-2. All subjects with CTTH received a single diagnosis in both classification systems. Conclusions.-(i) Among adolescents with TM, the majority (58.1%) could be classified as CM, according to the ICHD-2. These results were driven by TM without medication overuse. (ii) If the ICHD-2 criteria for CM are revised to require 15 days of migraine or probable migraine, the proportion of patients with TM- who meet the criteria for CM increases from 71% to 84%; for TM+, the proportion with probable chronic migraine and PMO increases from 30% to 68%. (iii) About half of the patients with NDPH according to the S-L criteria have too many migraine features to meet ICHD-2 criteria for NDPH. (Headache 2005;45:582-589).
机译:目标-比较第二版《国际头痛分类》(ICHD-2)和Silberstein-Lipton(S-L)标准对慢性每日头痛(CDH)青少年的分类。方法:-我们回顾了1998年至2003年在头痛中心看到的170例青少年(13至17岁)的临床记录和头痛日记。相关信息已转换为标准格式,其中包括ICHD-2的操作标准。根据SL提出的标准,将CDH亚型分为有(TM +)和无药物过度使用(TM-),慢性紧张型头痛(CTTH),每日新发持续性头痛(NDPH)和半连续性偏头痛的转化偏头痛(TM)( HC)。结果-在S-L标准的69例TM-患者中,大多数(71%)可分类为慢性偏头痛(CM),而少数患者需要综合诊断,主要是偏头痛和CTTH(14.4%)。在TM +患者中,只有39.6%符合可能的CM(PCM)和可能的药物过度使用(PMO)的标准。如果我们考虑每月15天或更长时间的偏头痛或可能的偏头痛,而不是每月15天的偏头痛,则可以对84%患有TM-的受试者和68.7%患有TM +的受试者进行分类。根据S-L系统,在没有药物过度使用的情况下被归类为NDPH的27名受试者中,根据ICHD-2,大多数(51.2%)也被归类为NDPH。有趣的是,ICHD-2中有3名(无药物过度使用的NDPH受试者中有11.1%)被归类为CM,因为这些患者每月突然发作15天或更长时间的偏头痛。根据S-L标准,所有NDPH过度用药的患者都需要在ICHD-2中进行综合诊断。在两种分类系统中,所有患有CTTH的受试者均接受了一次诊断。结论-(i)根据ICHD-2,在患有TM的青少年中,大多数(58.1%)可归为CM。这些结果是由TM驱动的,没有过度使用药物。 (ii)如果将CM的ICHD-2标准修订为需要15天的偏头痛或可能的偏头痛,则符合CM标准的TM-患者的比例将从71%增加到84%;对于TM +​​,可能的慢性偏头痛和PMO的比例从30%增加到68%。 (iii)根据S-L标准,大约一半的NDPH患者的偏头痛特征过多,无法满足ICHD-2 NDPH标准。 (头痛2005; 45:582-589)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号