...
首页> 外文期刊>Haemophilia: the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia >Reliability and construct validity of the compatible MRI scoring system for evaluation of elbows in haemophilic children.
【24h】

Reliability and construct validity of the compatible MRI scoring system for evaluation of elbows in haemophilic children.

机译:相容性MRI评分系统评估嗜血儿童肘部的可靠性和结构效度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We assessed the reliability and construct validity of the Compatible MRI scale for evaluation of elbows, and compared the diagnostic performance of MRI and radiographs for assessment of these joints. Twenty-nine MR examinations of elbows from 27 boys with haemophilia A and B [age range, 5-17 years (mean, 11.5)] were independently read by four blinded radiologists on two occasions. Three centres participated in the study: (Toronto, n = 24 examinations; Atlanta, n = 3; Cuiaba, n = 2). The number of previous joint bleeds and severity of haemophilia were reference standard measures. The inter-reader reliability of MRI scores was substantial (ICC = 0.73) for the additive (A)-scale and excellent (ICC = 0.83) for the progressive (P)-scale. The intrareader reliability was excellent for both P-scores (ICC = 0.91) and A-scores (ICC = 0.93). The total P- and A-scores correlated poorly (r = 0.36) or moderately (r = 0.54), but positively, with clinical-laboratory measurements. The total MRI scores demonstrated highaccuracy for discrimination of presence or absence of arthropathy [P-scale, area-under-the-curve (AUC) = 0.94 +/- 0.05; A-scale, AUC = 0.89 +/- 0.06], as did the soft tissue scores of both scales (P-scale, AUC = 0.90 +/- 0.06; A-scale, AUC 0.86 +/- 0.06). Areas-under-the-curve used to discriminate severe disease demonstrated high accuracy for both P-MRI scores (AUC = 0.83 +/- 0.09) and A-MRI scores (AUC = 0.87 +/- 0.09), but non-diagnostic ability to discriminate mild disease. Similar results were noted for radiographic scales. In conclusion, both MRI scales demonstrated substantial to excellent reliability and accuracy for discrimination of presence/absence of arthropathy, and severeon-severe disease, but poor to moderate convergent validity for total scores and non-diagnostic discriminant validity for mildon-mild disease. Compared with radiographic scores, MRI scales did not perform better for discrimination of severity of arthropathy.
机译:我们评估了用于肘部评估的兼容MRI量表的可靠性和结构效度,并比较了MRI和X射线照片对这些关节的诊断性能。两名盲人放射线医师分别两次对27名A和B型血友病男孩的肘部进行了29次MR检查[年龄范围,5-17岁(平均11.5)]。三个中心参加了该研究:(多伦多,n = 24次考试;亚特兰大,n = 3;库亚巴,n = 2)。以前的关节出血数量和血友病严重程度是参考标准措施。 MRI评分的读者间可靠性对于加法(A)量表而言是实质性(ICC = 0.73),而对于渐进(P)量表而言则是出色的(ICC = 0.83)。 P分数(ICC = 0.91)和A分数(ICC = 0.93)的读卡器内可靠性都非常好。总P分数和A分数与临床实验室测量值的相关性较差(r = 0.36)或中等(r = 0.54),但呈正相关。 MRI总评分显示出对关节病存在或不存在进行区分的高准确性[P量表,曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.94 +/- 0.05; A量表,AUC = 0.89 +/- 0.06],两个量表的软组织评分也是如此(P量表,AUC = 0.90 +/- 0.06; A量表,AUC 0.86 +/- 0.06)。用于区分严重疾病的曲线下区域在P-MRI评分(AUC = 0.83 +/- 0.09)和A-MRI评分(AUC = 0.87 +/- 0.09)方面均显示出很高的准确性,但具有非诊断能力区分轻度疾病。对于射线照相量表,也发现了类似的结果。总而言之,两种MRI量表均能很好地区分关节病的存在与否以及严重/非严重疾病,具有极高的信度和准确性,但对总分的评定效度差到中度,对轻度/非严重程度的诊断力不强。轻度疾病。与放射学评分相比,MRI量表在区分关节病严重程度方面表现不佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号