首页> 外文期刊>World journal of gastroenterology : >Diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia: Dilemma for Korean pathologists.
【24h】

Diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia: Dilemma for Korean pathologists.

机译:胃上皮瘤的诊断:韩国病理学家的困境。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The histopathological diagnosis of gastric mucosal biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection/endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens is important, but the diagnostic criteria, terminology, and grading system are not the same in the East and West. A structurally invasive focus is necessary to diagnose carcinoma for most Western pathologists, but Japanese pathologists make a diagnosis of cancer based on severe dysplastic cytologic atypia irrespective of the presence of invasion. Although the Vienna classification was introduced to reduce diagnostic discrepancies, it has been difficult to adopt due to different concepts for gastric epithelial neoplastic lesions. Korean pathologists experience much difficulty making a diagnosis because we are influenced by Japanese pathologists as well as Western medicine. Japan is geographically close to Korea, and academic exchanges are active. Additionally, Korean doctors are familiar with Western style medical terminology. As a result, the terminology, definitions, and diagnostic criteria for gastric intraepithelial neoplasia are very heterogeneous in Korea. To solve this problem, the Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists has made an effort and has suggested guidelines for differential diagnosis: (1) a diagnosis of carcinoma is based on invasion; (2) the most important characteristic of low grade dysplasia is the architectural pattern such as regular distribution of crypts without severe branching, budding, or marked glandular crowding; (3) if nuclear pseudostratification occupies more than the basal half of the cryptal cells in three or more adjacent crypts, the lesion is considered high grade dysplasia; (4) if severe cytologic atypia is present, careful inspection for invasive foci is necessary, because the risk for invasion is very high; and (5) other structural or nuclear atypia should be evaluated to make a final decision such as cribriform pattern, papillae, ridges, vesicular nuclei, high nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, loss of nuclear polarity, thick and irregular nuclear membrane, and nucleoli.
机译:胃黏膜活检和内镜下黏膜切除/内镜下黏膜下剥离标本的组织病理学诊断很重要,但东西方的诊断标准,术语和分级系统并不相同。对于大多数西方病理学家而言,结构侵入性诊断是诊断癌症所必需的,但是日本病理学家会根据严重的异常增生性细胞学非典型性来诊断癌症,而与是否存在侵入无关。尽管采用了维也纳分类法以减少诊断差异,但由于胃上皮肿瘤性病变的概念不同,因此难以采用。韩国病理学家在诊断时会遇到很多困难,因为我们受到日本病理学家和西医的影响。日本在地理位置上与韩国接近,并且学术交流活跃。此外,韩国医生熟悉西式医学术语。结果,在韩国,胃上皮内瘤变的术语,定义和诊断标准非常不同。为了解决这个问题,大韩病理学家学会胃肠道病理学研究小组做出了努力,并提出了鉴别诊断的指南:(1)癌的诊断是基于侵袭; (2)低度不典型增生的最重要特征是建筑模式,例如隐窝的规则分布,没有严重的分支,出芽或明显的腺体拥挤; (3)如果在三个或更多相邻隐窝中核假性分层占隐窝细胞的基底一半以上,则该病变被认为是高度不典型增生; (4)如果存在严重的细胞异型性,则必须仔细检查浸润灶,因为浸润的风险很高; (5)应评估其他结构或核型非典型性,以做出最终决定,例如筛状样,乳头,脊,水泡核,高核质比,核极性丧失,核膜厚和不规则以及核仁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号