...
首页> 外文期刊>Wear: an International Journal on the Science and Technology of Friction, Lubrication and Wear >Abrasive wear behaviour of conventional and large-particle tungsten carbide-based cermet coatings as a function of abrasive size and type
【24h】

Abrasive wear behaviour of conventional and large-particle tungsten carbide-based cermet coatings as a function of abrasive size and type

机译:常规和大颗粒碳化钨基金属陶瓷涂层的磨料磨损行为与磨料尺寸和类型的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abrasive wear behaviour of materials can be assessed using a wide variety of testing methods, and the relative performance of materials will tend to depend upon the testing procedure employed. In this work, two cermet type coatings have been examined, namely (i) a conventional tungsten carbide-cobalt thermally sprayed coating with a carbide size of between ~0.3-5 μm and (ii) a tungsten carbide-nickel alloy weld overlay with large spherical carbides of the order of ~50-140 μm in diameter (DuraStell). The wear behaviour of these two materials has been examined by the use of two abrasion tests, namely the micro-scale abrasion test using both silica and alumina abrasives (typically 2-10 μm in size), and the dry sand-rubber wheel test (ASTM G65), again with both silica and alumina abrasives (typically 180-300 μm in size). It was found that when the abrasive particles were of the same scale or larger than the mean free path between the hard phase particles, then the matrix phase was well protected by the hard phases. Testing (in both test types) with alumina abrasives resulted in wear of both the hard carbide phases and the matrix phases in both the thermally sprayed coating and the weld overlay, with the thermally sprayed coating exhibiting lower wear rates. The wear behaviour of the materials with the more industrially relevant silica abrasive was more complex; the thermally sprayed coating exhibited a lower wear rate than the weld overlay with the fine abrasive in the micro-scale abrasion test due to effective shielding of the matrix from abrasive action due to the fine reinforcement particle size. In contrast, with the coarser silica abrasive in the dry sand-rubber wheel test, the weld overlay with the large carbides was able to provide matrix protection with low rates of wear, whereas the thermally sprayed coating wore by fracture of the more brittle microstructure. These findings demonstrate the importance of selection of appropriate laboratory test procedures and abrasives to simulate behaviour of materials in service environments.
机译:可以使用多种测试方法来评估材料的磨料磨损行为,并且材料的相对性能将倾向于取决于所采用的测试程序。在这项工作中,已经研究了两种金属陶瓷类型的涂层,即(i)碳化物尺寸在〜0.3-5μm之间的常规碳化钨-钴热喷涂涂层,以及(ii)具有大的碳化钨-镍合金焊缝直径约为50-140μm的球形碳化物(DuraStell)。这两种材料的磨损行为已通过两项磨耗测试进行了检验,即使用二氧化硅和氧化铝磨料(尺寸通常为2-10μm)进行的微型磨耗测试,以及干砂橡胶轮测试( ASTM G65),同样使用二氧化硅和氧化铝研磨剂(尺寸通常为180-300μm)。发现当磨料颗粒的尺寸等于或大于硬质相颗粒之间的平均自由程时,则基质相被硬质相很好地保护。使用氧化铝磨料进行的测试(在两种测试类型中)都会导致热喷涂涂层和焊缝覆盖层中硬质碳化物相和基体相的磨损,而热喷涂涂层的磨损率更低。具有更工业相关性的二氧化硅磨料的材料的磨损行为更为复杂。在微尺度磨损试验中,由于有效地保护了基体不受细增强颗粒尺寸的磨蚀作用的影响,热喷涂涂层的磨损率低于采用细磨料的堆焊层。相反,在干砂轮试验中使用较粗的二氧化硅磨料,具有大碳化物的焊缝能够以低磨损率提供基体保护,而热喷涂涂层由于较脆的微结构破裂而磨损。这些发现证明了选择合适的实验室测试程序和磨料以模拟服务环境中材料行为的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号