首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Emergency Medicine >Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) for severe sepsis/septic shock: Which components of treatment are more difficult to implement in a community-based emergency department?
【24h】

Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) for severe sepsis/septic shock: Which components of treatment are more difficult to implement in a community-based emergency department?

机译:严重脓毒症/败血性休克的早期目标导向疗法(EGDT):在社区急诊室中,较难实施哪些治疗成分?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock, however, implementation of this protocol in the emergency department (ED) is sometimes difficult. Objectives: We evaluated our sepsis protocol to determine which EGDT elements were more difficult to implement in our community-based ED. Methods: This was a non-concurrent cohort study of adult patients entered into a sepsis protocol at a single community hospital from July 2008 to March 2009. Charts were reviewed for the following process measures: a predefined crystalloid bolus, antibiotic administration, central venous catheter insertion, central venous pressure measurement, arterial line insertion, vasopressor utilization, central venous oxygen saturation measurement, and use of a standardized order set. We also compared the individual component adherence with survival to hospital discharge. Results: A total of 98 patients presented over a 9-month period. Measures with the highest adherence were vasopressor administration (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 69-89%) and antibiotic use (78%; 95% CI 68-85%). Measures with the lowest adherence included arterial line placement (42%; 95% CI 32-52%), central venous pressure measurement (27%; 95% CI 18-36%), and central venous oxygen saturation measurement (15%; 95% CI 7-23%). Fifty-seven patients survived to hospital discharge (Mortality: 33%). The only element of EDGT to demonstrate a statistical significance in patients surviving to hospital discharge was the crystalloid bolus (79% vs. 46%) (respiratory rate [RR] = 1.76, 95% CI 1.11-2.58). Conclusion: In our community hospital, arterial line placement, central venous pressure measurement, and central venous oxygen saturation measurement were the most difficult elements of EGDT to implement. Patients who survived to hospital discharge were more likely to receive the crystalloid bolus.
机译:背景:早期目标导向疗法(EGDT)已被证明可以降低严重败血症/败血性休克患者的死亡率,但是,在急诊室(ED)实施该方案有时很困难。目标:我们评估了败血症方案,以确定哪些EGDT元素在我们基于社区的ED中更难实施。方法:这是一项针对2008年7月至2009年3月在一家社区医院接受败血症治疗的成年患者的非同期队列研究。插入,中心静脉压测量,动脉管线插入,血管加压药利用,中心静脉血氧饱和度测量以及使用标准化的命令集。我们还比较了个体成分依从性与生存至出院的情况。结果:在9个月的时间内共有98位患者就诊。依从性最高的措施是使用血管加压药(79%; 95%置信区间[CI] 69-89%)和抗生素使用(78%; 95%CI 68-85%)。依从性最低的措施包括动脉管路放置(42%; 95%CI 32-52%),中心静脉压测量(27%; 95%CI 18-36%)和中心静脉血氧饱和度测量(15%; 95) %CI 7-23%)。五十七名患者幸存至出院(死亡率:33%)。 EDGT在存活患者中显示出统计学意义的唯一元素是晶体推注(79%比46%)(呼吸频率[RR] = 1.76,95%CI 1.11-2.58)。结论:在我们的社区医院,动脉导管放置,中心静脉压测量和中心静脉血氧饱和度测量是EGDT实施中最困难的要素。存活到出院的患者更有可能接受晶体推注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号