...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Science and Technology >Comparative study of different formulations and solution methods for two phase flow in saturated porous media
【24h】

Comparative study of different formulations and solution methods for two phase flow in saturated porous media

机译:饱和多孔介质中两相流不同配方和求解方法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Six models (Simulators) are formulated and developed with all possible combinations of pressure and saturation of the phases as primary variables. A comparative study between six simulators with two numerical methods, conventional simultaneous and modified sequential methods are carried out. The results of the numerical models are compared with the laboratory experimental results to study the accuracy of the model especially in heterogeneous porous media. From the study it is observed that the simulator using pressure and saturation of the wetting fluid (P_W, S_W formulation) is the best among the models tested. Many simulators with nonwetting phase as one of the primary variables did not converge when used along with simultaneous method. Based on simulator 1 (P_W, S_W formulation), a comparison of different solution methods such as simultaneous method, modified sequential and adaptive solution modified sequential method are carried out on 4 test problems including heterogeneous and randomly heterogeneous problems. It is found that the modified sequential and adaptive solution modified sequential methods could save the memory by half and as also the CPU time required by these methods is very less when compared with that using simultaneous method. It is also found that the simulator with PNW and P_W as the primary variable which had problem of convergence using the simultaneous method, converged using both the modified sequential method and also using adaptive solution modified sequential method. The present study indicates that pressure and saturation formulation along with adaptive solution modified sequential method is the best among the different simulators and methods tested.
机译:制定并开发了六个模型(仿真器),其中压力和相饱和度的所有可能组合都是主要变量。对使用两种数值方法,常规同时方法和改进顺序方法的六个模拟器进行了比较研究。将数值模型的结果与实验室实验结果进行比较,以研究模型的准确性,尤其是在非均质多孔介质中。从研究中可以看出,在所测试的模型中,使用压力和润湿液饱和度(P_W,S_W公式)的模拟器是最好的。与非同步状态作为主要变量之一的许多仿真器在与同步方法一起使用时并未收敛。基于模拟器1(P_W,S_W公式),对包括异类和随机异类问题在内的4个测试问题进行了比较,同时方法,改进顺序方法和自适应解决方法改进顺序方法都进行了比较。发现改进的顺序和自适应解决方案的改进的顺序方法可以节省一半的内存,并且与同时使用方法相比,这些方法所需的CPU时间也非常少。还发现,以PNW和P_W为主要变量的模拟器在使用同步方法时存在收敛问题,同时使用改进的顺序方法和自适应解决方案改进的顺序方法进行收敛。本研究表明,压力和饱和度公式以及自适应解决方案修改的顺序方法是测试的不同模拟器和方法中最好的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号