...
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of prosthodontics >Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth.
【24h】

Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth.

机译:后牙全瓷镶嵌和镶嵌修复物的临床表现。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this clinical retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical performance and longevity of glass-ceramic onlays and inlays in stress-bearing posterior teeth. Materials and Method:: Five hundred forty-seven posterior teeth in the maxillae and mandibles of 120 patients (46 males, 74 females) were restored with 213 onlays, 38 single-surface inlays, 141 two-surface inlays, and 155 three-surface inlays between 1987 and 2009 at Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria, by two experienced dentists. The restoration sample included 9 (1.6%) nonvital teeth and 40 (33%) patients diagnosed with bruxism. The study population was examined clinically during regularly scheduled maintenance appointments. The risk of failure was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Results: The mean observation periods for onlays and all inlays were 80 ± 34 months and 111 ± 63 months, respectively. Twenty-seven failures were recorded. The estimated survival rates for onlays and all inlays after 5, 10, and 12 years were 98.9% and 98.9%, 92.4% and 96.8%, and 92.4% and 89.6%, respectively. Nonvital teeth showed a significantly higher risk of failure (P < .001). There was no greater risk of failure associated with existing parafunction (bruxism) (P = .408). Restorations on premolars survived longer in the first 15 years than restorations on molars, but no statistical significance was found (P = .913). Conclusion: Glass-ceramic onlays and inlays were demonstrated to be successful in posterior teeth; however, at this time, their efficacy is inferior to that of cast gold restorations.
机译:目的:本临床回顾性研究的目的是评估玻璃陶瓷嵌体和承压后牙的嵌体的临床性能和寿命。材料和方法:修复120例患者的上颌及下颌骨的47颗后牙(男46例,女74例),其中213例,38例单面嵌体,141例两面嵌体和155例三面嵌体在1987年至2009年之间由两名经验丰富的牙医在奥地利因斯布鲁克的因斯布鲁克医科大学进行镶嵌。修复样本包括9颗(1.6%)非活牙和40颗(33%)被诊断为磨牙症的患者。在定期安排的维护预约中对研究人群进行了临床检查。使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析确定失败的风险。结果:嵌体和所有嵌体的平均观察期分别为80±34个月和111±63个月。记录了27个失败。 5年,10年和12年后,嵌体和所有嵌体的估计生存率分别为98.9%和98.9%,92.4%和96.8%,92.4%和89.6%。非活体牙齿显示出更高的失败风险(P <.001)。与现有的副功能(轻瘫)相关的失败风险没有更大的风险(P = .408)。前磨牙的修复比前磨牙的修复存活的前15年更长,但是没有统计学意义(P = .913)。结论:玻璃陶瓷嵌体和嵌体在后牙中被证明是成功的。但是,此时,它们的功效不如铸金修复体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号