首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Parasitology >Weight gain-based targeted selective treatments (TST) of gastrointestinal nematodes in first-season grazing cattle.
【24h】

Weight gain-based targeted selective treatments (TST) of gastrointestinal nematodes in first-season grazing cattle.

机译:基于体重增加的第一季放牧牛胃肠道线虫的靶向选择性治疗(TST)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A three-year trial was performed in south-western Sweden to compare animal performance and levels of parasite control in three grazing groups, each with 18-24 first-season grazing (FSG) calves in similar set-stocked pasture enclosures. These groups were subjected to: (1) no parasite control (NT), (2) monthly repeated doramectin (DectomaxReg.) injections (SP), or (3) targeted selective weight gain-based anthelmintic treatments (TST) but only when individual calf performance was inferior to the average of the poorer 50% of those calves in group SP. In each year, weight and parasitological variables were measured at turn-out and then at predetermined intervals for 22-24 weeks during the grazing season. The dewormed calves in group SP had a higher average weight gain at housing (range 0.39-0.61 kg/day) than those in TST (0.36-0.50 kg/day), which in turn always exceeded the NT group (0.23-0.42 kg/day). This indicates that the parasite challenge in the NT group was sufficiently high to result in production loss. However, the average cumulative faecal egg counts (FEC) at housing in NT were in the range 1271-1953 eggs per gram faeces (epg) and in TST 1221-1968 epg. In contrast, parasite eggs were rarely recorded in group SP and then only during the first two years (on average 12 and 38 epg). There were also no significant differences in FEC or serum pepsinogen levels between FSG in groups NT and TST. The animals in SP received 7 doses of doramectin each year, whereas those in TST received an average of 0.5 doses. Thus, the TST approach represented a 92% reduction in anthelmintic use. The average weight gain in animals subjected to TST was always significantly lower than in animals dewormed regularly. In addition, there were no signs of short-term selection for anthelmintic resistance in the group SP animals, despite the fairly intensive use of injectable doramectin.
机译:在瑞典西南部进行了为期三年的试验,比较了三个放牧组的动物生产性能和寄生虫控制水平,每个组在类似的固定放牧围栏中分别饲养了18-24只第一季放牧犊牛。这些组接受以下治疗:(1)无寄生虫对照(NT),(2)每月重复一次doramectin(DectomaxReg。)注射(SP)或(3)有针对性的选择性增重型驱虫药(TST),但仅限于个体使用小牛的表现不及SP组中50%的小牛的平均值。在放牧季节中,每年在出栏后,然后以预定的时间间隔22-24周测量体重和寄生虫学变量。 SP组的驱虫犊牛的房屋平均增重(范围为0.39-0.61 kg /天)高于TST组(0.36-0.50 kg /天),这反过来总是超过NT组(0.23-0.42 kg /天)天)。这表明NT组的寄生虫攻击足够高,以致导致生产损失。但是,在北领地,平均累积粪便卵数(FEC)在每克粪便(epg)和TST 1221-1968 epg 1271-1953卵之间。相比之下,SP组很少记录寄生虫卵,然后仅在头两年记录(平均12和38 epg)。在NT和TST组中,FSG之间的FEC或血清胃蛋白酶原水平也无显着差异。 SP中的动物每年接受7剂量的doramectin,而TST中的动物平均接受0.5剂量。因此,TST方法代表驱虫药使用减少了92%。经历过TST的动物的平均体重增加总是明显低于定期驱虫的动物。此外,尽管相当大量地使用了可注射的多拉菌素,但SP组动物的驱虫抗药性没有短期选择的迹象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号