...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Parasitology >Comparative evaluation and economic assessment of coprological diagnostic methods and PCR for detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in bovines
【24h】

Comparative evaluation and economic assessment of coprological diagnostic methods and PCR for detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in bovines

机译:阴道隐孢子虫菌种诊断方法和PCR的比较评价和经济评价。在牛中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The role of Cryptosporidium spp. as a major cause of diarrhoea and gastrointestinal illness of protozoan origin in neonatal calves has been established. Many coprological and serological techniques have been described for detection of the parasites with the limitations of sensitivity and specificity. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique offers a useful alternative to conventional diagnosis of Cryptosporidium spp. in bovines from both clinical and environmental samples. We compared four conventional coprological techniques, viz., direct faecal smear staining (DFSS), normal saline sedimentation staining (NSSS), Sheather's flotation (SF) and Sheather's flotation sedimentation staining (SFSS) with PCR directed against the 18S SSU rRNA gene as standard reference test for the diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis in bovines. Out of 457 faecal samples collected from neonatal bovine calves, specific PCR amplification was achieved in 138 samples, whereas, 65 samples turned positive by DFSS. Normal saline sedimentation staining, SF and SFSS could detect 92, 82 and 109 samples as positive, respectively. Sheather's flotation sedimentation staining was found to be the most sensitive (82.6%) and specific (98.76%) among the coprological techniques. On per sample processing based cost analysis, DFSS was found to be the most economical method (15 cents) followed by NSSS (19.6 cents), SF (23.6 cents) and SFSS (33.9 cents). The time taken for complete processing and diagnosis varied between 70 and 100min. PCR based diagnosis of a sample took about 7.5-8h for completion and cost of diagnosis was estimated as approximately 7.604 US$ per sample. Among the conventional coprological methods, SFSS provided the required sensitivity and specificity along with nominal cost for diagnosis on per sample basis, and may be considered as a viable diagnostic alternative when PCR is not an option for a particular laboratory setting, especially in developing countries. This is the first comparative study describing the sensitivity and specificities of four conventional coprological techniques altogether with respect to PCR along with the economic assessment and per sample diagnosis time of all the techniques for the diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis in bovines.
机译:隐孢子虫的作用。已经确立了作为新生牛犊的原生动物腹泻和胃肠道疾病的主要原因。已经描述了许多用于敏感性检测的寄生虫学和血清学技术,其敏感性和特异性受到限制。聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术为常规诊断隐孢子虫提供了有用的替代方法。从临床和环境样品中提取牛体内的脂肪。我们比较了四种常规的阴道细菌学技术,即直接粪便涂片染色(DFSS),生理盐水沉淀染色(NSSS),Sheather浮选(SF)和Sheather浮选沉淀染色(SFSS),并以18S SSU rRNA基因为标准诊断牛隐孢子虫病的参考测试。从新生儿牛犊收集的457份粪便样本中,有138份样本实现了特异性PCR扩增,而DFSS将65份样本转为阳性。生理盐水沉淀染色,SF和SFSS分别可检测出92、82和109个样品为阳性。希瑟的浮选沉降染色法是最敏感的(82.6%)和特异性(98.76%)。在基于每个样本处理的成本分析中,DFSS被认为是最经济的方法(15美分),其次是NSSS(19.6美分),SF(23.6美分)和SFSS(33.9美分)。完全处理和诊断所需的时间在70到100分钟之间变化。基于PCR的样品诊断需要约7.5-8h才能完成,诊断费用估计为每个样品约7.604 US $。在常规的结肠癌方法中,SFSS提供了所需的敏感性和特异性,以及基于每个样品进行诊断所需的名义成本,如果在特定实验室环境(尤其是在发展中国家)中PCR不可行时,SFSS可被视为可行的诊断选择。这是第一项比较研究,它描述了四种常规coprological技术相对于PCR的敏感性和特异性,以及所有诊断牛隐孢子虫病的技术的经济评估和每样品诊断时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号