首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis >Comparative evaluation of FASTPlaque assay with PCR and other conventional in vitro diagnostic methods for the early detection of pulmonary tuberculosis
【2h】

Comparative evaluation of FASTPlaque assay with PCR and other conventional in vitro diagnostic methods for the early detection of pulmonary tuberculosis

机译:PCR和其他常规体外诊断方法对FASTPlaque测定进行肺结核早期检测的比较评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of symptomatic patients of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is highly desirable to minimize the spread of the disease in the society. We, therefore, compared the usefulness of various conventional diagnostic methods, the in‐house polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the FASTPlaque assay in this study. Laboratory data of 150 patients with clinical diagnosis of pulmonary TB and 50 controls were included in this study. The sputa from all these 200 individuals were subjected to acid‐fast staining, culture on Lowenstein–Jensen (L‐J) slants, automated BACTEC‐MGIT‐960 culture methods, and a mycobacteriophage assay. A mycobacterium genus and species‐specific PCRs were also done and samples positive on both PCRs were considered as standard for comparison. Of the 5 in vitro diagnostic tests, PCR method was found to be the most rapid, sensitive, and specific, detecting all the 150 cases of pulmonary TB without any false‐positive and negative result. In comparison with PCR the sensitivity of MGIT‐960 was 90%, followed by FASTPlaque assay (76.7%), L‐J culture method (73.3%), and microscopy (60%). The mean detection time for smear‐positive and smear‐negative samples was 12.5 and 14 days in MGIT‐960 and 18 and 25 days for L‐J method, respectively. The FASTPlaque failed to detect mycobacteria from the paucibacillary samples. The contamination rates for MGIT‐960, L‐J, and FASTPlaque assays were 4, 8 and 10%, respectively. The best correlation with mycobacterial load in the specimen was observed in BACTEC‐MGIT‐960 showing 66.6% detection rate in paucibacillary, 83.3% in 1+ samples, and 100% in 2+ and 3+ samples. Out of the 150 patients, 140 (93.3%) could be diagnosed by one or more nonmolecular methods. Therefore, it could be concluded that combination of three or more in vitro diagnostic methods will have acceptable detection level. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 22:367–374, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
机译:为了使疾病在社会上的传播最小化,非常需要对有症状的肺结核(TB)患者进行快速而准确的诊断。因此,在本研究中,我们比较了各种常规诊断方法,内部聚合酶链反应(PCR)和FASTPlaque测定的有用性。这项研究包括150例临床诊断为肺结核的患者和50例对照的实验室数据。对这200个个体的痰液进行耐酸染色,在Lowenstein-Jensen(L-J)斜面上培养,自动的BACTEC-MGIT-960培养方法和分枝杆菌噬菌体测定。还进行了分枝杆菌属和物种特异性PCR,并且两个PCR均为阳性的样品被认为是比较的标准。在5项体外诊断测试中,PCR方法被发现是最快,最灵敏,最特异性的方法,可检测出全部150例肺结核,而没有任何假阳性和阴性结果。与PCR相比,MGIT-960的敏感性为90%,然后进行FASTPlaque分析(76.7%),L-J培养法(73.3%)和显微镜检查(60%)。 MGIT-960中涂片阳性和涂片阴性样品的平均检测时间分别为12.5天和14天,L-J方法的平均检测时间分别为18天和25天。 FASTPlaque无法从杆状杆菌样品中检测到分枝杆菌。 MGIT-960,L-J和FASTPlaque分析的污染率分别为4%,8%和10%。在BACTEC-MGIT-960中观察到与标本中的分枝杆菌载量的最佳相关性,其中在脓杆菌中检出率为66.6%,在1+个样品中为83.3%,在2+和3+样品中为100%。在150例患者中,有140例(93.3%)可通过一种或多种非分子方法诊断出来。因此,可以得出结论,三种或更多种体外诊断方法的组合将具有可接受的检测水平。 J.临床实验室肛门22:367–374,2008.©2008 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号