...
首页> 外文期刊>Valve World >Rupture pin or rupture disc: Which is the clear choice for pressure relief?
【24h】

Rupture pin or rupture disc: Which is the clear choice for pressure relief?

机译:破裂销或破裂盘:哪个是泄压的明显选择?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The fundamentals of pressure relief applications are safety, efficiency, maintenance level, downtime duration, operating costs and environmental friendliness. Does the rupture pin alleviate the issues that go with such applications, or is the rupture disc a more sensible option? This article discusses the juxtaposition between the two and gives an insight as to which is the clear choice for pressure relief. There are two basic, non-reclosing primary methods outlined by ASME section VIII for pressure relief the rupture pin and rupture disc. It is important to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each so that the correct selection for a specific pressure relief application can be made. According to ASME Section VIII Division I, both rupture pins and rupture discs may be used as a primary or sole relieving device (see Figure I). The one caveat to remember about non-reclosing relief devices is that once they are open, they remain open. They will not reclose until manually replacing the rupture pin or disc.
机译:泄压应用的基本原理是安全性,效率,维护水平,停机时间,运营成本和环境友好性。破裂针是否可以缓解此类应用带来的问题,还是破裂盘是更明智的选择?本文讨论了两者之间的并置,并提供了一种见解,以了解哪种是泄压的明确选择。 ASME第八节概述了两种基本的,不可重合的主要方法,用于释放破裂销和破裂盘的压力。重要的是要了解每种方法的优缺点,以便针对特定的泄压应用做出正确的选择。根据ASME第八节I部分的规定,破裂销和破裂盘均可用作主要或唯一的泄压装置(见图I)。关于非重合释放装置,要记住的一个警告是,一旦打开,它们就保持打开状态。除非手动更换破裂销或制动盘,否则它们不会重新合上。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Valve World》 |2011年第1期|共3页
  • 作者

    John Butterfield;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 TH134.1;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号