首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >Preemptive versus Non-preemptive simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a single-center, long-term, follow-up study.
【24h】

Preemptive versus Non-preemptive simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a single-center, long-term, follow-up study.

机译:先发性与非先发性同时胰肾移植:一项单中心,长期的随访研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the timing-before or after initiation of dialysis-of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with end-stage renal failure are sparse. We studied the effect of preemptive transplantation on patient survival, cardiovascular endpoints, and graft survival, as compared with non-preemptive transplantation. METHODS: All 180 SPKT recipients (aged 23-58 years) who received a SPKT in Leiden between December 1986 and May 2004 were included in the analysis. Sixty-five patients (36.1%) were transplanted preemptively. Mean follow-up time was 6.3 years. RESULTS: Up to 8.2 years after transplantation, we found no differences in patient survival. Later on, divergence occurred: 10-year patient survival was 71.3% in the preemptive group versus 63.8% in the dialysis group and 15-year patient survival was 64.8% versus 45.1% in the dialysis group, leading to an adjusted hazard ratio for mortality of 0.50 (95% CI 0.23-1.06, P=0.070). Cause of death was less often of cardiac origin in the preemptive group (adjusted HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.026-0.95, P=0.044). Graft survival did not follow the same trend. No significant differences were found between the two groups considering allograft survival, cerebrovascular accident, or myocardial infarction. The percentage of patients with minor or major amputation(s) after transplantation was slightly lower in the preemptive group (24.6 vs. 32.1%; adjusted HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.42-1.82, P=0.72). CONCLUSION: Preemptive SPKT offered a patient survival benefit as compared with transplantation performed while already on dialysis and was associated with a lower rate of cardiac deaths.
机译:背景:关于终末期肾功能衰竭的1型糖尿病患者同时进行胰肾肾移植(SPKT)之前或之后的时间安排的数据很少。与非抢先移植相比,我们研究了抢先移植对患者存活率,心血管终点和移植物存活的影响。方法:所有1986年12月至2004年5月在莱顿接受SPKT的180名SPKT接受者(年龄在23-58岁之间)都包括在分析中。抢先移植了65例患者(36.1%)。平均随访时间为6。3年。结果:移植后长达8.2年,我们发现患者存活率无差异。后来,出现了分歧:抢先组的10年患者生存率为71.3%,而透析组为63.8%,透析组的15年患者生存率为64.8%对45.1%,这导致死亡率的风险比调整后0.50(95%CI 0.23-1.06,P = 0.070)。抢先组的死因很少是心脏起源的(校正后的HR 0.16; 95%CI 0.026-0.95,P = 0.044)。移植物存活率没有遵循相同的趋势。在考虑同种异体移植物存活,脑血管意外或心肌梗死方面,两组之间没有发现显着差异。抢先组移植后有轻度或重度截肢的患者百分比略低(24.6比32.1%;校正后的HR 0.87; 95%CI 0.42-1.82,P = 0.72)。结论:与已经进行透析的移植相比,抢先的SPKT可以为患者带来生存益处,并且与心脏死亡的发生率较低相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号