...
首页> 外文期刊>Tribology letters >Comparison of Friction and Wear Behavior Between C/C, C/C-SiC and Metallic Composite Materials
【24h】

Comparison of Friction and Wear Behavior Between C/C, C/C-SiC and Metallic Composite Materials

机译:C / C,C / C-SiC与金属复合材料之间的摩擦磨损性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The search for suitable friction materials for high-speed train is an attractive but difficult problem. In recent years, a variety of different novel friction materials were fabricated to meet the aims of high loads and speeds under ambient environment. Carbon fiber-reinforced carbon composites (C/C), carbon fiber-reinforced silicon carbide composites (C/C-SiC) and metallic composites fabricated by powder metallurgy are three excellent materials among them. Here a comparison of these three different materials working as brake pads, coupled with high-density C/C-SiC brake disk, was described. All the experiments were conducted using the same procedure with increasing initial braking speed (the rotation speed of brake disk at the beginning of braking process) from 30 to 59 m/s and constant load of 1.25 MPa, simulating the real working condition of highspeed train. The coefficient of friction (COF) and wear rates of three materials were compared and analyzed. During experiments, the COF of metallic and C/C pads remains nearly constant at 0.31 and 0.22, respectively, with increasing braking speed, while that of C/C-SiC exhibits a parabola. These different trends of COF may be attributed to the distinctive forming processes of friction film on the top of contact surfaces. Meanwhile, the wear rates of metallic composites increase rapidly from 683 to 1803 mm(3)/MJ with initial braking speed, while C/C-SiC presents the highest wear loss of 1887 mm(3)/MJ at 49 m/s and lowest value of 315 mm(3)/MJ at 59 m/s. Interestingly, the wear rate of C/C composites, due to the appropriate bonding strength of matrix/fiber and relatively high shear stress, decreases from 3698 to 903 mm(3)/MJ with increasing initial braking speed, which does not consist with pre-existing paper. Thus, metallic pads presented the lowest wear rates at lower speed (<49 m/s) but the highest at high speed, while C/C-SiC composite pads showed the greatest wear resistance at high speed. This investigation of three different friction materials will enhance our understanding of these friction materials and benefit the selection and safe application of high-speed train friction materials.
机译:为高速列车寻找合适的摩擦材料是一个有吸引力的但困难的问题。近年来,制造了各种不同的新型摩擦材料,以满足环境下高负载和高速度的目的。碳纤维增强碳复合材料(C / C),碳纤维增强碳化硅复合材料(C / C-SiC)和粉末冶金法制备的金属复合材料是其中的三种优异材料。在此,对这三种用作制动衬块的材料以及高密度C / C-SiC制动盘进行了比较。所有实验均以相同的程序进行,将初始制动速度(制动过程开始时制动盘的旋转速度)从30 m / s增加到恒定载荷1.25 MPa,模拟了高速列车的实际工作状态。 。对三种材料的摩擦系数(COF)和磨损率进行了比较和分析。在实验期间,随着制动速度的提高,金属和C / C垫的COF分别保持几乎恒定不变,分别为0.31和0.22,而C / C-SiC的COF则呈现抛物线。 COF的这些不同趋势可能归因于接触表面顶部摩擦膜的独特形成过程。同时,在初始制动速度下,金属复合材料的磨损率从683迅速增加到1803 mm(3)/ MJ,而C / C-SiC在49 m / s时表现出最高的磨损损失1887 mm(3)/ MJ。最低值为315 mm(3)/ MJ(59 m / s)。有趣的是,由于适当的基体/纤维粘结强度和较高的剪切应力,C / C复合材料的磨损率会随着初始制动速度的增加而从3698降低至903 mm(3)/ MJ,而这与预制动速度不符。现有的纸。因此,金属垫在较低速度(<49 m / s)下磨损率最低,而在高速下磨损率最高,而C / C-SiC复合垫在高速下表现出最大的耐磨性。对三种不同摩擦材料的研究将增进我们对这些摩擦材料的理解,并有利于高速列车摩擦材料的选择和安全应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号