首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Plasma expander and blood storage effects on capillary perfusion in transfusion after hemorrhage
【24h】

Plasma expander and blood storage effects on capillary perfusion in transfusion after hemorrhage

机译:血浆扩张剂和储血对出血后输血中毛细血管灌注的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Treating hemorrhage with blood transfusions in subjects previously hemodiluted with different colloidal plasma expanders, using fresh autologous blood or blood that has been stored for 2 weeks, allows identifying the interaction between type of plasma expander and differences in blood storage. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Studies used the hamster window chamber model. Fresh autologous plasma, 130-kDa starch-based plasma expander (hydroxyethyl starch [HES]), or 4% polyethylene glycol-conjugated albumin (PEG-Alb) was used for 20% of blood volume (BV) hemodilution. Hemodilution was followed by a 55% by BV 40-minute hemorrhagic shock period, treated with transfusion of fresh or blood that was stored for 2 weeks. Outcome was evaluated 1 hour after blood transfusion in terms of microvascular and systemic variables. RESULTS: Results were principally dependent on the type of colloidal solution used during hemodilution, 4% PEG-Alb yielding the best microvascular recovery evaluated in terms of the functional capillary density. This result was consistent whether fresh blood or stored blood was used in treating the subsequent shock period. Fresh blood results were significantly better in systemic and microvascular terms relative to stored blood. HES and fresh plasma hemodilution yielded less favorable results, a difference that was enhanced when fresh versus stored blood was compared in their efficacy of correcting the subsequent hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: The type of plasma expander used for hemodilution influences the short-term outcome of subsequent volume resuscitation using blood transfusion, 4% PEG-Alb providing the most favorable outcome by comparison to HES or fresh plasma.
机译:背景:使用新鲜的自体血液或已储存2周的血液,对先前用不同的胶体血浆扩张剂进行血液稀释的受试者进行输血治疗,可以确定血浆扩张剂的类型与血液存储差异之间的相互作用。研究设计和方法:研究使用仓鼠窗室模型。新鲜的自体血浆,130 kDa的基于淀粉的血浆膨胀剂(羟乙基淀粉[HES])或4%的聚乙二醇偶联的白蛋白(PEG-Alb)用于血液稀释(BV)的20%。血液稀释后,BV 40分钟的出血休克期为55%,并通过输注新鲜血液或血液处理2周。在输血后1小时,根据微血管和全身变量评估结局。结果:结果主要取决于血液稀释过程中使用的胶体溶液的类型,就功能性毛细血管密度而言,4%PEG-Alb产生最佳的微血管恢复率。无论使用新鲜血液还是储存血液治疗随后的休克期,这一结果都是一致的。相对于储存的血液,新鲜血液的结果在全身和微血管方面明显更好。 HES和新鲜血浆血液稀释产生的不良结果较差,当比较新鲜血液与储存的血液在纠正后续出血方面的功效时,这种差异有所增强。结论:用于血液稀释的血浆扩展剂的类型会影响随后通过输血进行体积复苏的短期结果,与HES或新鲜血浆相比,4%PEG-Alb提供了最有利的结果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号