首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Bacterial detection in apheresis platelets: blood systems experience with a two-bottle and one-bottle culture system.
【24h】

Bacterial detection in apheresis platelets: blood systems experience with a two-bottle and one-bottle culture system.

机译:单采血液血小板中的细菌检测:血液系统具有两瓶和一瓶培养系统。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: United Blood Services (UBS) began bacterial testing of platelets (PLTs) using one-bottle cultures in September 2003. Collection of 7-day PLTs using two-bottle cultures began in April 2006. This study compares our experience using both systems. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PLTs from 13 UBS regional centers cultured from September 1, 2003, to September 1, 2007, were included in the analysis. Positive-signal bottles from a commercially available microbial detection system (BacT/ALERT, bioMerieux) were sent, with corresponding PLTs if available, for confirmatory testing using plate culture media. AABB definitions were used with modifications. RESULTS: A total of 51,265 7-day PLT collections and 191,521 5-day PLT collections were tested with bacterial cultures. The overall true-positive (TP) rate for the two-bottle system (1:8544) was comparable to the TP rate with the previous one-bottle system (1:6344). In three of six yield cases, only the anaerobic bottle was positive (two cases of Group D Streptococci, one case of Corynebacterium spp.). The false-positive (FP) and indeterminate (IND) rates in the anaerobic bottle (1:1767 and 1:1830, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the aerobic bottle (1:6408 and 1:17,088, respectively; p < 0.001). One confirmed transfusion-related septic reaction, classified as a late TP after investigation, was reported out of 242,786 tested PLT donations. CONCLUSION: The rate of TP cases by the two-bottle system was not increased over the one-bottle system, although anaerobic-bottle-only positive cases were detected. FP and IND rates were increased in the two-bottle system, attributable to the anaerobic bottle. Observation of only one documented transfusion-related septic reaction in 4 years of bacterial screening at UBS is reassuring, although limitations in passive surveillance and higher rates of reactions reported by others indicate the need for continued vigilance.
机译:背景:美国联合血液服务公司(UBS)从2003年9月开始使用一瓶培养物对血小板(PLT)进行细菌测试。从2006年4月开始,使用两瓶培养物收集7天的PLT。本研究比较了我们使用这两种系统的经验。研究设计和方法:分析包括2003年9月1日至2007年9月1日培养的13个瑞银地区中心的PLT。发送了来自市售微生物检测系统(BacT / ALERT,bioMerieux)的正信号瓶,以及相应的PLT(如果有),以便使用平板培养基进行验证性测试。 AABB定义经过修改使用。结果:共进行了51265例7天PLT收集和191521例5天PLT收集,并进行了细菌培养。两瓶系统(1:8544)的总真实阳性(TP)速率与以前的一瓶系统(1:6344)的TP速率相当。在六个产量案例中的三个中,只有厌氧瓶为阳性(D组链球菌2例,棒状杆菌1例)。厌氧瓶中的假阳性(FP)和不确定(IND)率(分别为1:1767和1:1830)显着高于需氧瓶中的假阳性(FP:1)和假想瓶(分别为1:6408和1:17,088); p < 0.001)。在242,786例经过测试的PLT捐赠中,报告了一项确认的输血相关败血症反应,经调查后被归类为晚期TP。结论:尽管仅检测到厌氧瓶阳性病例,但两瓶系统的TP病例率没有比单瓶系统增加。两瓶系统中的FP和IND率增加,这归因于厌氧瓶。尽管在被动监测中的局限性以及其他人报告的更高的反应率表明需要持续保持警惕,但瑞银在细菌筛查的4年中仅观察到一个与输血有关的败血症反应是令人放心的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号