...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >The impact of male-to-male sexual experience on risk profiles of blood donors.
【24h】

The impact of male-to-male sexual experience on risk profiles of blood donors.

机译:男性对男性的性经历对献血者风险的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Men who have had sex with men (MSM) since 1977 are permanently deferred from donating blood. Excluding only men who engaged in male-to-male sex within either the prior 12 months or 5 years has been proposed. Little is known about infectious disease risks of MSM who donate blood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Weighted analyses of data from an anonymous mail survey of blood donors were conducted to examine the characteristics of men reporting male-to-male sex during specified time periods. RESULTS: Of the 25,168 male respondents, 569 (2.4%) reported male-to-male sex, 280 (1.2%) since 1977. Compared to donors who did not report male-to-male sex, the prevalence of reactive screening test results was higher among donors who reported the practice within the past 5 years (< or =12 months odds ratio [OR] 5.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-10.4; >12 months to 5 years, OR 7.1, 95% CI 1.2-41.7); however, no significant difference was found for donors who last practiced male-to-male sex more than 5 years ago (>5 years-after 1977, OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.7-2.6; 1977 or earlier, OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.7-3.7). The prevalence of unreported deferrable risks (UDRs) other than male-to-male sex was significantly higher for all donors who reported male-to-male sex with ORs ranging from 3.1 to 18.9 (p < or = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found to support changing current policy to permit donations from men who practiced male-to-male sex within the past 5 years. For donors with a more remote history of male-to-male sex, the findings were equivocal. A better understanding of the association between male-to-male sex and other UDRs appears needed.
机译:背景:自1977年以来与男性发生性关系(MSM)的男性被永久推迟献血。提议只排除在过去的12个月或5年内从事男同性恋行为的男性。关于献血的MSM的传染病风险知之甚少。研究设计和方法:对来自无偿献血者的匿名邮件调查的数据进行了加权分析,以检查在指定时间段内报告男女性别的男性特征。结果:在25,168名男性受访者中,有569名(2.4%)报告为男性至男性,自1977年以来为280名(1.2%)。与未报告男性至男性的捐助者相比,反应性筛查结果的普遍性在过去5年内报告该做法的捐赠者中更高(<或= 12个月,优势比[OR] 5.3,95%置信区间[CI] 2.6-10.4;> 12个月至5年,或7.1,95%CI 1.2-41.7);然而,对于最后一次实行男对男的性行为的供血者,五年以上(1977年后> 5年,OR 1.4,95%CI 0.7-2.6; 1977年或更早,OR 1.6,95%)没有发现显着差异。 CI 0.7-3.7)。对于所有报告的男性与男性性别OR介于3.1至18.9之间的捐赠者,除男性与男性性别外,未报告的可延期风险(UDR)的患病率显着更高(p <或= 0.01)。结论:没有证据支持改变现行政策,允许过去五年内实行男对男的男性捐赠。对于具有较远的男女性别病史的捐赠者来说,结果是模棱两可的。似乎需要更好地了解男女之间的关系和其他UDR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号