首页> 外文期刊>Translational research: the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine >Applicability of estimating glomerular filtration rate equations in pediatric patients: comparison with a measured glomerular filtration rate by iohexol clearance
【24h】

Applicability of estimating glomerular filtration rate equations in pediatric patients: comparison with a measured glomerular filtration rate by iohexol clearance

机译:估计儿科患者肾小球滤过率方程的适用性:与碘海醇清除率与测得的肾小球滤过率比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has become popular in clinical medicine as an alternative to measured GFR (mGFR), but there are few studies comparing them in clinical practice. We determined mGFR by iohexol clearance in 81 consecutive children in routine practice and calculated eGFR from 14 standard equations using serum creatinine, cystatin C, and urea nitrogen that were collected at the time of the mGFR procedure. Nonparametric Wilcoxon test, Spearman correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, bias (median difference), and accuracy (P-15, P-30) were used to compare mGFR with eGFR. For the entire study group, the mGFR was 77.9 +/- 38.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Eight of the 14 estimating equations demonstrated values without a significant difference from the mGFR value and demonstrated a lower bias in Bland-Altman analysis. Three of these 8 equations based on a combination of creatinine and cystatin C (Schwartz et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:629-37; Schwartz et al. Improved equations estimating GFR in children with chronic kidney disease using an immunonephelometric determination of cystatin C. Kidney Int 2012;82:445-53; Chehade et al. New combined serum creatinine and cystatin C quadratic formula for GFR assessment in children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;9:54-63) had the highest accuracy with approximately 60% of P-15 and 80% of P-30. In 10 patients with a single kidney, 7 with kidney transplant, and 11 additional children with short stature, values of the 3 equations had low bias and no significant difference when compared with mGFR. In conclusion, the 3 equations that used cystatin C, creatinine, and growth parameters performed in a superior manner over univariate equations based on either creatinine or cystatin C and also had good applicability in specific pediatric patients with single kidneys, those with a kidney transplant, and short stature. Thus, we suggest that eGFR calculations in pediatric clinical practice use only a multivariate equation.
机译:估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)作为测量GFR(mGFR)的替代方法已在临床医学中流行,但是很少有研究在临床实践中对它们进行比较。我们通过常规实践中连续81位儿童的碘海醇清除率确定mGFR,并使用在mGFR手术时收集的血清肌酐,半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C和尿素氮从14个标准方程式计算eGFR。使用非参数Wilcoxon检验,Spearman相关性,Bland-Altman分析,偏差(中位数差异)和准确性(P-15,P-30)比较mGFR和eGFR。对于整个研究组,mGFR为77.9 +/- 38.8 mL / min / 1.73 m(2)。 14个估计方程式中的8个显示的值与mGFR值无显着差异,并且在Bland-Altman分析中显示出较低的偏差。这8个方程中的三个基于肌酸酐和半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C的组合(Schwartz等人,用于评估CKD儿童的GFR的新方程式.J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20:629-37; Schwartz等人。慢性肾病患儿的免疫浊度法测定半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C. Kidney Int 2012; 82:445-53; Chehade et al。新型血清肌酐和半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C二次方联合配方用于儿童GFR评估。Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 9 :54-63)的精度最高,大约有60%的P-15和80%的P-30。在10名单肾患者,7名肾移植患者和11名其他身材矮小的儿童中,与mGFR相比,这3个方程的值具有较低的偏倚且无显着差异。总之,与基于肌酐或胱抑素C的单变量方程相比,使用胱抑素C,肌酐和生长参数的3个方程式表现更好,并且在特定的单肾小儿患者,肾脏移植患者中也具有良好的适用性,身材矮小。因此,我们建议儿科临床实践中的eGFR计算仅使用多元方程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号