首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >How Have Changes in Front Air Bag Designs Affected Frontal Crash Death Rates? An Update
【24h】

How Have Changes in Front Air Bag Designs Affected Frontal Crash Death Rates? An Update

机译:前排气囊设计的变化如何影响正面碰撞死亡率?更新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Provide updated death rates comparing latest generations of frontal air bags in fatal crashes. Methods: Rates of driver and right-front passenger deaths in frontal crashes per 10 million registered vehicle years were compared using Poisson marginal structural models for passenger vehicles equipped with air bags certified as advanced and compliant (CAC), sled-certified air bags with advanced features, and sled-certified air bags without any advanced features. Analyses of driver death rates were disaggregated by age group, gender, and belt use. Results: CAC air bags were associated with slightly elevated frontal crash death rates for both drivers and right-front passengers compared to sled-certified air bags with advanced features, but the differences were not statistically significant. Sled-certified air bags with advanced features were associated with significant benefits for drivers and for right-front passengers compared to sled-certified air bags without advanced features. CAC air bags were associated with a significant increase in belted driver death rate and a comparable but nonsignificant decrease in unbelted driver death rate compared to sled-certified air bags with advanced features. Sled-certified air bags with advanced features were associated with a nonsignificant 2 percent increase in belted driver death rate and a significant 26 percent decrease in unbelted driver death rate, relative to sled-certified air bags without advanced features. Conclusions: Implementing advanced features in sled-certified air bags was beneficial overall to drivers and right-front passengers with sled-certified air bags. No overall benefit was observed for CAC air bags compared to sled-certified air bags with advanced features. Further study is needed to understand the apparent reduction in belted driver protection observed for CAC air bags.
机译:目的:提供致命事故中最新一代前额安全气囊的比较最新死亡率。方法:使用泊松边际结构模型,对配备了高级安全气囊(CAC),雪橇安全气囊和高级安全气囊的乘用车的泊松边际结构模型,比较每1000万注册车辆年中正面撞车事故中驾驶员和右前乘客的死亡率功能和没有任何高级功能的经过雪橇认证的安全气囊。驾驶员死亡率分析按年龄组,性别和安全带使用情况分类。结果:与具有高级功能的经过雪橇认证的安全气囊相比,驾驶员和右前乘客的CAC安全气囊与正面碰撞死亡率略有增加,但差异无统计学意义。与没有高级功能的经过雪橇认证的安全气囊相比,具有高级功能的经过雪橇认证的安全气囊为驾驶员和右前乘客带来了显着的收益。与具有高级功能的经过雪橇认证的安全气囊相比,CAC安全气囊与安全带驾驶员死亡率显着增加,无安全带驾驶员死亡率显着降低,但无明显差异。与没有高级功能的经过雪橇认证的安全气囊相比,具有高级功能的经过雪橇认证的安全气囊的安全带驾驶员死亡率增加了2%,而未系安全带的驾驶员死亡率却降低了26%。结论:在经过雪橇认证的安全气囊中实现高级功能对于使用雪橇认证的安全气囊的驾驶员和右前乘客总体而言是有益的。与具有高级功能的经雪橇认证的安全气囊相比,CAC安全气囊没有发现总体优势。需要进一步研究以了解对于CAC气囊观察到的安全带驾驶员保护明显减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号