...
首页> 外文期刊>Surface and Interface Analysis: SIA: An International Journal Devoted to the Development and Application of Techniques for the Analysis of Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films >Experimental determination of electron inelastic mean free paths in 13 elemental solids in the 50 to 5000 eV energy range by elastic-peak electron spectroscopy
【24h】

Experimental determination of electron inelastic mean free paths in 13 elemental solids in the 50 to 5000 eV energy range by elastic-peak electron spectroscopy

机译:弹性峰电子光谱法实验确定能量范围在50到5000 eV的13种元素固体中的电子非弹性平均自由程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We have determined electron inelastic mean free paths (IMFPs) in C (graphite), Si, Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn, Ga, Mo, Ag, Ta, W, Pt and Au by elastic-peak electron spectroscopy (EPES) using Ni as a reference material for electron energies between 50 and 5000 eV. These IMFPs could be fitted by the simple Bethe equation for inelastic electron scattering in matter for energies from 100 to 5000 eV. The average root-mean-square (RMS) deviation in these fits was 9%. The IMFPs for Si, Cr, Fe, Cu, Ag, Ta, W, Pt and Au were in excellent agreement with the corresponding values calculated from optical data for energies between 100 and 5000 eV. While the RMS differences for graphite and Mo in these comparisons were large (27 and 17%, respectively), the average RMS difference for the other 11 elements was 11%. Similar comparisons were made between our IMFPs and values obtained from the TPP-2M predictive equation for energies between 100 and 5000 eV, and the average RMS difference for the 13 solids was 10.7%; in these comparisons, the RMS differences for Ta and W were relatively large (26% for each). A correction for surface-electronic excitations was calculated from a formula of Werner et al.; except for Si and Ga, the average correction was 5% for energies between 150 and 5000 eV. The satisfactory consistency between the IMFPs from our EPES experiments and the corresponding IMFPs computed from optical data indicates that the uncertainty of these IMFPs is about 11% for electron energies between 100 and 5000 eV. Similar comparisons with IMFPs from the EPES experiments of Werner et al. showed a consistency of 8% for energies between 200 and 5000 eV. Copyright (C) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:我们已经使用弹性峰电子光谱法(EPES)测定了C(石墨),Si,Cr,Fe,Cu,Zn,Ga,Mo,Ag,Ta,W,Pt和Au中的电子非弹性平均自由程(IMFP) Ni作为50至5000 eV之间电子能量的参考材料。对于能量在100至5000 eV之间的物质中的非弹性电子散射,可以通过简单的Bethe方程拟合这些IMFP。这些拟合的平均均方根(RMS)偏差为9%。 Si,Cr,Fe,Cu,Ag,Ta,W,Pt和Au的IMFP与从100到5000 eV能量的光学数据计算出的相应值非常一致。尽管在这些比较中石墨和Mo的RMS差异很大(分别为27%和17%),但其他11种元素的平均RMS差异为11%。我们的IMFP与从TPP-2M预测方程式获得的100至5000 eV能量之间的值进行了类似的比较,这13种固体的平均RMS差为10.7%。在这些比较中,Ta和W的RMS差异相对较大(各为26%)。表面电子激发的校正是根据Werner等人的公式计算得出的。除Si和Ga外,对于150至5000 eV之间的能量,平均校正度为5%。我们的EPES实验中的IMFP与根据光学数据计算出的相应IMFP之间令人满意的一致性表明,对于100至5000 eV之间的电子能量,这些IMFP的不确定性约为11%。与Werner等人的EPES实验中的IMFP进行的类似比较。在200至5000 eV之间的能量下,显示出8%的一致性。版权所有(C)2005 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号