...
首页> 外文期刊>Toxicology Letters: An International Journal Providing a Forum for Original and Pertinent Contributions in Toxicology Research >Risk assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use in food and food supplements: emerging issues.
【24h】

Risk assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use in food and food supplements: emerging issues.

机译:用于食品和食品补充剂的植物药和植物制剂的风险评估:新出现的问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

At present there is a growing interest for use of botanicals and botanical ingredients in medicines, for teas or in foods and in food supplements. In addition, a number of plant-derived food items form an integral part of regular human diets. Currently, there is an increasing awareness among safety experts and regulators of risks associated with the use of botanicals and botanical ingredients in food including food supplements. It is becoming clear that natural effects can occur as a result of (mis)use. With the growing awareness of these issues efforts to ensure safety of botanicals and botanical ingredients are also increasing. Several guidance documents on safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations to be used as ingredients in food and food supplements have been published, although, at present, relevant legislative frameworks and guidances for risk assessment are not established yet. Furthermore, when defining possible guidance documents for risk assessment of botanicals, several issues emerge that need to be developed beyond the present state-of-the-art. The present paper describes some of the issues to be considered and developed to a further extent to improve risk assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations, illustrated by examples based on some allylalkoxybenzenes. It is concluded that, for an improved and more accurate future risk assessment of botanicals, it is necessary to further develop and validate: (i) the use of the margin of exposure (MOE) concept for compounds that are both genotoxic and carcinogenic; (ii) new ways to quantify and incorporate matrix effects into risk assessment strategies; (iii) the use of analytical chemistry approaches, enabling complete chemical characterisation of complex mixtures. Defining new approaches in risk assessment would be in line with the inspiring attitude of the late Professor Robert Kroes, who, for example by supporting the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concept, was a pioneer for development and implementation of new paradigms in the field of risk assessment and food safety.
机译:目前,人们越来越关注在药物,茶或食品以及食品补充剂中使用植物药和植物成分。此外,许多植物性食品构成了人类日常饮食的组成部分。当前,安全专家和管理者对与食品(包括食品补充剂)中使用植物药和植物成分有关的风险的意识正在增强。越来越明显的是,(滥用)使用会产生自然效应。随着对这些问题的认识不断提高,确保植物药和植物成分安全的努力也在增加。已经发布了几份有关用作食品和食品补充剂成分的植物药和植物制剂的安全性评估的指导文件,尽管目前尚未建立相关的立法框架和风险评估指南。此外,在定义可能的植物药风险评估指导文件时,出现了一些需要在当前最新技术水平以外发展的问题。本文介绍了一些需要考虑和进一步发展的问题,以改善对植物药和植物制剂的风险评估,通过一些基于烯丙基烷氧基苯的实例说明了这些问题。结论是,为了对植物药进行改进的,更准确的未来风险评估,有必要进一步发展和验证: (ii)量化矩阵效应并将其纳入风险评估策略的新方法; (iii)使用分析化学方法,可以对复杂混合物进行完整的化学表征。定义新的风险评估方法将与已故的Robert Kroes教授的鼓舞态度相一致,Robert Kroes教授例如通过支持毒理学关注阈值(TTC)概念,成为该领域新范例开发和实施的先驱。风险评估和食品安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号