...
首页> 外文期刊>Toxicologic pathology >Inhalation studies in laboratory animals--current concepts and alternatives.
【24h】

Inhalation studies in laboratory animals--current concepts and alternatives.

机译:实验动物的吸入研究-当前概念和替代方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Highly standardized and controlled inhalation studies are required for hazard identification to make test results reproducible and comparable and to fulfill general regulatory requirements for the registration of new drugs, pesticides, or chemicals. Despite significant efforts, the results of inhalation studies have to be analyzed judiciously due to the great number of variables. These variables may be related to technical issues or to the specific features of the animal model. Although inhalation exposure of animals mimics human exposure best, ie, error-prone route-to-route extrapolations are not necessary, not all results obtained under such very rigorous test conditions may necessarily also occur under real-life exposure conditions. Attempts are often made to duplicate as closely as possible these real-life exposure conditions of humans in appropriate bioassays. However, this in turn might affect established baseline data, rendering the interpretation of new findings difficult. In addition, specific use patterns, eg, of inhalation pharmaceuticals or pesticide-containing consumer products, may impose test agent-specific constraints that challenge traditional approaches. Moreover, specific modes of action of the substance under investigation, the evaluation of specific endpoints, or the clarification of equivocal findings in common rodent species may require exposure paradigms or the use of animal species not commonly used in inhalation toxicology. However, particularly in inhalation toxicology, the choice of animal models for inhalation toxicity testing is usually based on guideline requirements and practical considerations, such as exposure technology, expediency, and previous experience rather than validity for use in human beings. Larger animal species, apart from the welfare aspects, may require larger inhalation chambers to accommodate the animals, but for technical reasons and the difficulty of generating homogeneous exposure atmospheres in such inhalation chambers, this may jeopardize the outcome of the study. Some of the many variables and possible artifacts likely to occur in animal inhalation studies are addressed in this paper.
机译:危害识别需要高度标准化和受控的吸入研究,以使测试结果可重复和可比,并满足新药,农药或化学药品注册的一般法规要求。尽管付出了巨大的努力,但由于变量众多,因此必须明智地分析吸入研究的结果。这些变量可能与技术问题或动物模型的特定特征有关。尽管动物的吸入暴露最佳地模拟了人类暴露,即,不需要容易出错的逐条路线外推法,但并非在如此严格的测试条件下获得的所有结果也不一定会在现实生活中暴露于条件下。人们常常试图在适当的生物测定中尽可能接近地复制人类的这些现实生活暴露条件。但是,这反过来可能会影响已建立的基准数据,从而难以解释新发现。此外,特定的使用模式(例如,吸入药物或含农药的消费品)可能会施加特定于测试剂的限制,从而挑战传统方法。而且,所研究物质的特定作用方式,特定终点的评估或澄清常见啮齿动物中的模棱两可的发现可能需要暴露范式或使用吸入毒理学中不常用的动物物种。但是,特别是在吸入毒理学中,选择吸入性毒性试验的动物模型通常是基于准则要求和实际考虑,例如接触技术,权宜之计和以前的经验,而不是在人类中使用的有效性。除福利方面以外,更大的动物物种可能需要更大的吸入室来容纳动物,但是由于技术原因以及在这种吸入室中难以产生均匀暴露环境的原因,这可能会危害研究结果。本文讨论了许多在动物吸入研究中可能发生的变量和可能的伪影。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号