首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis Research: An International Journal on Vascular Obstruction, Hemorrhage and Hemostasis >Comparison of the effect of different platelet GPIIb/IIa antagonists on the dynamics of platelet/fibrin-mediated clot strength induced using thromboelastography.
【24h】

Comparison of the effect of different platelet GPIIb/IIa antagonists on the dynamics of platelet/fibrin-mediated clot strength induced using thromboelastography.

机译:比较不同血小板GPIIb / IIa拮抗剂对血栓弹力描记法诱导的血小板/纤维蛋白介导的凝块强度动态的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The effect of various platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) antagonists on the dynamics of platelet-fibrin clot formation and strength induced by various stimuli was measured by thromboelastography (TEG). GPIIb/IIIa antagonists with high affinity for resting and activated platelets and with slow rates of dissociation from GPIIb/IIIa (Class I antagonists) demonstrated potent and comparable inhibition of platelet aggregation and tissue factor (TF), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), Factor Xa, and thrombin-induced clot strength, in contrast to antagonists that dissociate rapidly from GPIIb/IIIa (Class II antagonists). For example, the Class I antagonist XV459 (the free acid form of roxifiban) inhibited TF, endotoxin, Factor Xa, and thrombin-induced maximal clot strength and platelet aggregation with an IC(50)=30-70 nM, whereas the IC(50) of the Class II antagonist YZ211 (the free acid form of sibrafiban) for altering clot formation and strength was 0.3-4.7 microM. Moreover, the IC(50)'s of sibrafiban, and another Class II antagonist, orbofiban, for inhibiting platelet-fibrin clot formation and strength were substantially greater than their clinically achievable concentrations. Further, although aspirin treatment improved the efficacy of all GPIIb/IIIa antagonists, it did not alter the differences between Classes I and II antagonists. Thus, these data indicate that there are differences in the efficacy of various GPIIb/IIIa antagonists in inhibiting platelet-fibrin clot formation and strength. They also suggest that inhibiting platelet aggregation may not be the sole determinant for the in vivo efficacy of various GPIIb/IIIa antagonists.
机译:通过血栓弹力图(TEG)测量了各种血小板糖蛋白IIb / IIIa(GPIIb / IIIa)拮抗剂对血小板纤维蛋白凝块形成动力学和各种刺激诱导的强度的影响。对静息血小板和活化血小板具有高亲和力且与GPIIb / IIIa的解离速率较慢的GPIIb / IIIa拮抗剂(I类拮抗剂)表现出对血小板聚集和组织因子(TF),脂多糖(LPS),因子Xa,与从GPIIb / IIIa迅速解离的拮抗剂(II类拮抗剂)形成对比的是凝血酶和凝血酶诱导的凝块强度。例如,I类拮抗剂XV459(roxifiban的游离酸形式)抑制TF,内毒素,因子Xa和凝血酶诱导的最大凝块强度和血小板聚集,其IC(50)= 30-70 nM,而IC(用于改变血块形成和强度的II类拮抗剂YZ211(西布拉非班的游离酸形式)的50μg为0.3-4.7μM。此外,用于抑制血小板纤维蛋白凝块形成和强度的西布拉非班和另一种II类拮抗剂奥波非班的IC(50)大大高于其临床上可达到的浓度。此外,尽管阿司匹林治疗提高了所有GPIIb / IIIa拮抗剂的疗效,但并未改变I类和II类拮抗剂之间的差异。因此,这些数据表明,各种GPIIb / IIIa拮抗剂在抑制血小板纤维蛋白凝块形成和强度方面的功效存在差异。他们还暗示抑制血小板凝集可能不是各种GPIIb / IIIa拮抗剂体内功效的唯一决定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号