...
首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Economic Studies >To Segregate or to Integrate: Education Politics and Democracy
【24h】

To Segregate or to Integrate: Education Politics and Democracy

机译:隔离或融合:教育政治与民主

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

How is the quality of public education affected by the presence of private schools for the rich? Theory and evidence suggest that the link depends crucially on the political system. We develop a theory that integrates private education and fertility decisions with voting on public schooling expenditures. We find that the presence of a large private education sector benefits public schools in a broad-based democracy where politicians are responsive to low-income families but crowds out public education spending in a society that is politically dominated by the rich. The main predictions of the theory are consistent with state-level data and micro data from the U.S. as well as cross-country evidence from the Programme for International Student Assessment study.
机译:富人的私立学校的存在对公共教育的质量有何影响?理论和证据表明,这种联系主要取决于政治制度。我们开发了一种理论,将私人教育和生育决策与对公立学校支出的投票相结合。我们发现,大型民办教育部门的存在使基础广泛的民主学校的公立学校受益,在这个民主国家,政客们对低收入家庭做出了回应,但在一个政治上由富人主导的社会中却排挤了公共教育支出。该理论的主要预测与美国的州级数据和微观数据以及国际学生评估计划研究的跨国证据相一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号