...
首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis >Inter-observer reliability of measures to assess the post-thrombotic syndrome.
【24h】

Inter-observer reliability of measures to assess the post-thrombotic syndrome.

机译:观察者间的可靠性,以评估血栓形成后综合征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The post thrombotic syndrome (PTS), the most common complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), develops in 20-40% of patients within 1-2 years after symptomatic DVT (1-4). PTS can be challenging to evaluate, due to its relatively non-specific symptoms and signs and a lack of 'gold standard' tests to diagnose PTS and rate its severity (1). A number of clinical scales have been developed to help standardize the diagnosis of PTS (1). Use of these scales requires an assessor to rate the presence or severity of physical signs associated with PTS. For example, Villalta's PTS scale takes into account both symptoms and clinical signs in classifying the presence and severity of PTS (5). This scale rates the severity, from 0 to 3 (0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate;3=severe), of five patient-reported symptoms (pain, cramps, heaviness, pruritus and paresthesia) and six clinician-observed physical signs (edema, skin induration, hyper-pigmentation, venous ectasia, redness, pain during calf compression). Points for severity of symptoms and signs are summed into a total score that categorises patients as having no PTS (score <5) or PTS (score >= 5 or presence of ulcer). Patient with PTS are further cat-egorized as having mild/moderate PTS (score 5-14) or severe PTS (score > 14 or presence of ulcer) (5).Prior to widespread adoption of PTS assessment scores in research and clinical practice both their validity and reliability (or reproducibility) must be demonstrated. Validity is established in prospective studies demonstrating that PTS scales adequately categorise patients into clinically meaningful groups with differing outcomes (e.g. morbidity or quality of life). The inter-observer reliability of PTS assessments must be also demonstrated. Adequate inter-observer reliability ensures that the use of these scales will be generalisable, in other words, that clinicians will similarly categorise patients as having PTS or not having PTS. Here we report on the inter-observer reliability (or reproducibility)of PTS physical examination findings in patients with unprovoked DVT and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) treated for a minimum of 5.5 months with anticoagulants.
机译:有症状的DVT发生后1-2年内,20-40%的患者会发生血栓后综合症(PTS),这是最常见的深静脉血栓形成(DVT)并发症(1-4)。由于PTS的症状和体征相对非特异性,并且缺乏用于诊断PTS和评估其严重性的“金标准”测试,因此其评估可能具有挑战性(1)。已经开发出许多临床量表来帮助标准化PTS的诊断(1)。这些量表的使用要求评估者对与PTS相关的体征的存在或严重程度进行评分。例如,在对PTS的存在和严重性进行分类时,Villalta的PTS量表同时考虑了症状和临床体征(5)。该量表将五种患者报告的症状(疼痛,抽筋,沉重,瘙痒和感觉异常)和六种临床医生观察到的严重程度从0分级为3(0 =不存在; 1 =轻度; 2 =中度; 3 =严重)身体症状(水肿,皮肤硬结,色素沉着,静脉扩张,发红,小腿受压时疼痛)。症状和体征的严重程度得分总和为将患者分类为没有PTS(得分<5)或PTS(得分> = 5或有溃疡)的总分。 PTS患者被进一步分类为轻度/中度PTS(评分5-14)或重度PTS(评分> 14或有溃疡)(5)。在研究和临床实践中广泛采用PTS评估分数之前必须证明其有效性和可靠性(或可重复性)。前瞻性研究证实了有效性,表明PTS量表可以将患者充分分类为具有不同结局(例如发病率或生活质量)的具有临床意义的人群。还必须证明PTS评估的观察者间可靠性。观察者之间的充分可靠性确保了这些量表的使用具有普遍性,换句话说,临床医生将对患者进行分类,将其分类为患有PTS或不患有PTS。在这里,我们报告了未经抗凝治疗至少5.5个月的DVT和/或肺栓塞(PE)引起的PTS体检结果的观察者间可靠性(或可重复性)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号