首页> 外文期刊>The Veterinary Journal >The human-canine environment: a risk factor for non-play bites?
【24h】

The human-canine environment: a risk factor for non-play bites?

机译:人畜环境:非玩耍被咬的危险因素吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Few dog bite risk factor studies have been conducted. This veterinary clinic-based retrospective cohort study was aimed at identifying human-canine environmental risk factors for non-play bites in Kingston, Jamaica (660) and San Francisco (SF), USA (452). Data were analysed using modified Poisson regression with confounders selected using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and the change-in-estimate procedure. Dogs acquired for companionship were more likely (RR=1.66; 95% CI 1.02-2.70) to bite than those acquired for protection. Routinely allowing a dog into the presence of visitors was also positively associated with it biting. A dog sleeping in a family member's bedroom was a risk factor for biting in Kingston (RR=2.54; 95% CI 1.43-4.54) but not in SF, while being able to leave the yard unaccompanied was a risk factor for biting in SF (RR=3.40; 95% CI 1.98-5.85) but not in Kingston. Overall, dogs which were less restricted in their interactions with humans were at elevated risk for biting. An observed association with dog bites in one cultural setting might not exist in another.
机译:很少进行狗咬伤危险因素研究。这项基于兽医临床的回顾性队列研究旨在确定牙买加金斯敦(660)和美国旧金山(SF)(452)中非玩耍性咬伤的人-犬环境危险因素。使用修正的Poisson回归分析数据,并使用有向无环图(DAG)和估计变化程序选择混杂因素。与为保护而获得的狗相比,因陪伴而获得的狗更容易被咬(RR = 1.66; 95%CI 1.02-2.70)。例行地允许狗进入来访者也与它咬人有正相关。在家庭成员卧室睡觉的狗是被金斯敦咬的危险因素(RR = 2.54; 95%CI 1.43-4.54),但在SF中却没有,而能够无人陪伴离开院子是咬SF的危险因素( RR = 3.40; 95%CI 1.98-5.85),但不在Kingston中。总体而言,与人互动较少受到限制的狗被咬的风险较高。在一种文化背景下,观察到的与狗咬伤的关联可能在另一种文化背景下不存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号