首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >Will new national boards mean in increase in retention fees?
【24h】

Will new national boards mean in increase in retention fees?

机译:新成立的国家委员会会增加保留费吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

"Divided,we stand" (PJ,12 February,pi64) and "A wake-up call" (PJ,4 June,p666) have been two attempts by the PJ to ignite the devolution debate within the Royal Pharmaceutical Society,yet there is scarcely a trickle of letters on the subject of devolution.Colin Ranshaw (PJ,2 July,p31) extols the need for a Welsh board but fails to make any connection with the cost of such a board.If the 2,200 pharmacists who reside in Wales say "we want,need and will pay for a Welsh board",I would certainly wish them well in their endeavours.However,a Welsh board with a small budget of say £200,000 would cost each Welsh pharmacist nearly £100.Would anyone hear singing in the valleys if this was the size of increase in the Welsh retention fee?
机译:“分裂,我们站立”(PJ,2月12日,pi64)和“唤醒电话”(PJ,6月4日,p666)是PJ试图在皇家制药学会内部引发权力下放辩论的两次尝试,在权力下放问题上,这简直是a花一现。柯林·兰肖(PJ,7月2日,第31页)夸大了对威尔士委员会的需要,但没有与这样的委员会的成本有任何联系。如果居住在这里的2200名药剂师威尔士说:“我们想要,需要并愿意为威尔士委员会付钱”,我当然希望他们一切顺利。但是,一个预算只有200,000英镑的威尔士委员会将使每位威尔士药剂师花费将近100英镑。听说这是威尔士保留费增加的幅度吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号