...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of extra-corporeal technology >Do surface-modifying additive circuits reduce the rate of cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass?
【24h】

Do surface-modifying additive circuits reduce the rate of cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass?

机译:表面修饰添加剂回路是否会降低体外循环期间脑微栓塞的发生率?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to determine if surface-modifying additive (SMA) cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits are associated with a lower rate of cerebral microemboli during CPB compared with standard circuits. In a 2 x 2 factorial design, patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomized to SMA or standard CPB circuits (with and without methyl-prednisolone). Transcranial Doppler was used to detect high-intensity transient signals (HITS) in both middle cerebral arteries. HITS were counted from onset to end of CPB. Intervals of interest were as follows: period 1, from CPB onset to aortic cross-clamping; period 2, from aortic cross-clamping to immediately before de-clamping; period 3, from aortic declamping to before aortic side-clamping; period 4, from the application of the aortic side clamp to immediately before the release of the side clamp; period 5, from aortic side clamp release to the end of CPB. There were 14 patients in each circuit group. No significant differences were found on the partial and total counts of HITS (medians [25th, 75th percentile]) between patients exposed to standard (total count: 228 HITS [174, 2801) and SMA circuits (total count: 156 HITS [104, 356]; p = .427). The median of the sum of HITS per patient associated with perfusionist interventions was not different between both circuit groups (standard: 17 HITS [7, 80]; SMA: 43 HITS [13, 168]; p = .085). This study, with a sample size of 28 patients, indicates that it is unlikely to find any difference in the count of HITS during CPB that is greater than 117 HITS between the two CPB circuits. Moreover, our findings emphasize the relevance of minimizing additional sources of cerebral microembolization during CPB that are not directly related to the biocompatible nature of the SMA CPB circuit.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定与标准回路相比,表面修饰添加剂(SMA)心肺旁路(CPB)回路是否与CPB期间较低的脑微栓子发生率相关。在2 x 2因子设计中,将接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者随机分配至SMA或标准CPB回路(有或没有甲基强的松龙)。经颅多普勒用于检测大脑中部两个动脉的高强度瞬时信号(HITS)。从CPB开始到结束计数HITS。感兴趣的时间间隔如下:第一阶段,从CPB发作到主动脉交叉夹闭;从主动脉交叉夹持到紧接钳夹之前的第二阶段;从主动脉钳夹到主动脉侧夹钳之前的3期;从主动脉侧夹的应用到释放侧夹之前的第4个周期;从主动脉侧钳释放到CPB结束的第5阶段。每个回路组有14例患者。在暴露于标准(总计数:228 HITS [174,2801])和SMA电路(总计数:156 HITS [104,104, 356]; p = .427)。在两个回路组之间,与灌注治疗相关的每位患者的HITS总和的中位数没有差异(标准:17 HITS [7,80]; SMA:43 HITS [13,168]; p = .085)。这项研究的样本量为28位患者,表明在CPB期间不太可能发现两个CPB回路之间的HITS计数差异大于117 HITS。此外,我们的研究结果强调了在CPB期间将与大脑CPB电路的生物相容性没有直接关系的脑微栓塞的其他来源减至最少的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号