...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: Official Journal of the American Society for Clinical Nutrition >Simple skinfold-thickness measurements complement conventional anthropometric assessments in predicting glucose tolerance.
【24h】

Simple skinfold-thickness measurements complement conventional anthropometric assessments in predicting glucose tolerance.

机译:简单的皮褶厚度测量可补充传统的人体测量学评估,以预测葡萄糖耐量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Skinfold-thickness measurements are considered to have limited clinical utility. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether skinfold-thickness measurements may be a useful adjunct to conventional anthropometric assessments in predicting glucose and insulin regulation, we studied responses to replicate 75-g oral-glucose-tolerance tests (OGTTs) and performed simple anthropometry in a cross section of subjects. DESIGN: Thirty-five subjects completed the study: 11 lean [mean (+/-SEM) age: 33 +/- 3.2 y; body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)): 24.1 +/- 0.8; and percentage body fat (%BF): 11.5 +/- 1.5%], 12 normal-weight (age: 33 +/- 2.9 y; BMI: 23.9 +/- 0.7; and %BF: 24.3.5 +/- 1.3%), and 12 obese (age: 41 +/- 4.5 y; BMI: 34.5 +/- 1.7; and %BF: 34.2 +/- 1.5%) individuals. The lean and normal-weight groups were selected to have similar BMIs but different %BFs. We measured the participants' heights, weights, %BFs, waist circumferences, hip circumferences, and truncal and peripheral skinfold thicknesses. Subjects received nine 75-g OGTTs and blood samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min. Mean plasma glucose and insulin values were used to calculate the insulin sensitivity index. RESULTS: The obese group had higher plasma glucose concentrations and areas under the curve (AUCs) than did the normal-weight or lean group and higher plasma insulin concentrations and AUCs than did the lean group (P < 0.05). Stepwise multiple regression, with adjustment for demographic and anthropometric measurements, identified the following predictors: waist circumference, peripheral skinfold thickness, and BMI for fasting plasma glucose (partial R(2) = 0.20, 0.13, and 0.13, P < 0.05); waist circumference and truncal skinfold thickness for plasma glucose AUC (partial R(2) = 0.20 and 0.13, P < 0.05); age, waist-to-hip ratio, and peripheral skinfold thickness for fasting plasma insulin (partial R(2) = 0.26, 0.22, and 0.15, P < 0.05); truncal skinfold thickness for plasma insulin AUC (partial R(2) = 0.41, P < 0.001); and peripheral skinfold thickness for both 2-h plasma glucose (partial R(2) = 0.59, P < 0.001) and the insulin sensitivity index (partial R(2) = 0.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Skinfold-thickness measurements may complement other established measurements for predicting abnormal glucose and insulin regulation.
机译:背景:皱皮厚度测量被认为具有有限的临床实用性。目的:为评估皮褶厚度测量是否可作为常规人体测量学评估中预测葡萄糖和胰岛素调节的有用辅助手段,我们研究了复制75 g口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的反应并在横截面上进行简单的人体测量的主题。设计:35名受试者完成了研究:11瘦[平均(+/- SEM)年龄:33 +/- 3.2岁;身体质量指数(BMI; kg / m(2)):24.1 +/- 0.8;和体脂百分比(%BF):11.5 +/- 1.5%],12正常体重(年龄:33 +/- 2.9岁; BMI:23.9 +/- 0.7;%BF:24.3.5 +/- 1.3 %)和12个肥胖(年龄:41 +/- 4.5岁; BMI:34.5 +/- 1.7;%BF:34.2 +/- 1.5%)个体。选择瘦体重和正常体重组具有相似的BMI,但具有不同的%BF。我们测量了参与者的身高,体重,%BFs,腰围,臀围以及躯干和周围的皮褶厚度。受试者接受了9个75 g OGTT,并在0、15、30、45、60、90和120分钟时收集了血样。平均血浆葡萄糖和胰岛素值用于计算胰岛素敏感性指数。结果:与正常体重或瘦肉组相比,肥胖组的血浆葡萄糖浓度和曲线下面积(AUCs)更高,与瘦肉组相比,血浆胰岛素浓度和AUCs更高(P <0.05)。逐步多元回归分析,以及人口统计学和人体测量学的调整,确定了以下预测因素:腰围,外周皮褶厚度和空腹血糖的BMI(部分R(2)= 0.20、0.13和0.13,P <0.05);血浆葡萄糖AUC的腰围和截尾皮褶厚度(部分R(2)= 0.20和0.13,P <0.05);空腹血浆胰岛素的年龄,腰臀比例和外周皮肤褶厚度(部分R(2)= 0.26、0.22和0.15,P <0.05);血浆胰岛素AUC的截尾皮褶厚度(部分R(2)= 0.41,P <0.001);和2小时血浆葡萄糖(部分R(2)= 0.59,P <0.001)和胰岛素敏感性指数(部分R(2)= 0.49,P <0.001)的外周皮褶厚度。结论:皮褶厚度测量可以补充其他已建立的测量,以预测异常的葡萄糖和胰岛素调节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号