...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: Official Journal of the American Society for Clinical Nutrition >The New Nordic Diet is an effective tool in environmental protection: It reduces the associated socioeconomic cost of diets
【24h】

The New Nordic Diet is an effective tool in environmental protection: It reduces the associated socioeconomic cost of diets

机译:新北欧饮食是环保的有效工具:它减少了饮食的相关社会经济成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The New Nordic Diet (NND) was designed by gastronomic, nutritional, and environmental specialists to be a palatable, healthy, and sustainable diet containing 35% less meat than the Average Danish Diet (ADD); more whole-grain products, nuts, fruit, and vegetables; locally grown food in season; and >75% organic produce. The environmental impact of the 2 diets was compared based on 16 impact categories, which were monetized to evaluate the overall socioeconomic effect of a shift from an ADD to an NND. Objective: The objective was to determine whether this diet shift can be an effective tool in environmental protection. Design: The 3 features by which this diet shift affects the environment-composition, transport (import), and type of production (organic/conventional)-were separately investigated by using life cycle assessment. Results: When both diet composition and transport were taken into account, the NND reduced the environmental impact relative to the ADD measured by all 16 impact categories. The socioeconomic savings related to this diet shift was ?266/person per year, or 32% of the overall environmental cost of the ADD. When the actual 8% content of organic produce in the ADD and the 84% content of organic produce in the investigated recipe-based NND were also taken into account, the NND reduced the environmental impact relative to the ADD measured by only 10 of the 16 impact categories whereas 6 were increased. The socioeconomic savings related to the diet shift were lowered to ?42/person per year, or 5% of the overall environmental cost of the ADD. Conclusion: Reducing the content of meat and excluding most longdistance imports were of substantial environmental and socioeconomic advantage to the NND when compared with the ADD, whereas including high amounts of organic produce was a disadvantage.
机译:背景:新北欧饮食(NND)是由美食,营养和环境专家设计的,它是一种美味,健康且可持续的饮食,其肉含量比丹麦平均饮食(ADD)少35%;更多全谷物产品,坚果,水果和蔬菜;时令当地种植的食物;以及> 75%的有机农产品。根据16种影响类别比较了这两种饮食对环境的影响,并通过货币化来评估从ADD转向NND的整体社会经济影响。目的:目的是确定这种饮食转变是否可以成为环境保护的有效工具。设计:通过生命周期评估分别研究了饮食结构变化对环境组成,运输(进口)和生产类型(有机/常规)的3个特征。结果:当同时考虑饮食组成和运输时,与所有16种影响类别相比,NND均相对于ADD降低了环境影响。与饮食变化有关的社会经济节省为每年每人266欧元,占ADD总体环境成本的32%。当还考虑了ADD中实际8%的有机产品含量和所研究的基于配方的NND中84%的有机产品含量时,NND相对于ADD测得的环境影响仅减少了16种中的10种影响类别,而增加了6个。与饮食转变有关的社会经济节省降低到每人每年42欧元,占ADD总体环境成本的5%。结论:与ADD相比,减少肉类含量并排除大多数长途进口对NND具有重大的环境和社会经济优势,而包括大量有机产品则是不利的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号