首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: Official Journal of the American Society for Clinical Nutrition >Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to improve daily fruit and vegetable intake in children aged 5 to 12 y
【24h】

Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to improve daily fruit and vegetable intake in children aged 5 to 12 y

机译:对学校干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析,以改善5至12岁儿童的日常水果和蔬菜摄入量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: To our knowledge, no reviews have assessed the impact of a range of multi- and single-component school-based programs on daily fruit and vegetable intake by using a meta-analysis. Objective: The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of school-based interventions on fruit and vegetable intake in children aged 5-12 y. Design: A systematic literature review was carried out to identify randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials that were based in primary schools and designed to increase portions of daily fruit and vegetable intake. MEDLINE, Cochrane libraries, EMBASE, Psyc-INFO, and Educational Information Centre were searched from 1985 to 2009. Data were extracted, and mean effect sizes were calculated by using random effects models. Results: A total of 27 school-based programs involving 26,361 children were identified that met the inclusion criteria and assessed the daily weight of fruit and vegetable intake combined, fruit intake only, or vegetable intake only, and 21 studies were used in meta-analyses. The results of the meta-analyses indicated an improvement of 0.25 portions (95% CI: 0.06, 0.43 portions) of fruit and vegetable daily intake if fruit juice was excluded and an improvement of 0.32 portions (95% CI: 0.14, 0.50 portions) if fruit juice was included. Improvement was mainly due to increases in fruit consumption but not in vegetable consumption. The results of the meta-analyses for fruit (excluding juice) and vegetables separately indicated an improvement of 0.24 portions (95% CI: 0.05, 0.43 portions) and 0.07 portions (95% CI: -0.03, 0.16 portions), respectively. Conclusions: School-based interventions moderately improve fruit intake but have minimal impact on vegetable intake. Additional studies are needed to address the barriers for success in changing dietary behavior, particularly in relation to vegetables.
机译:背景:据我们所知,尚无评论使用荟萃分析评估一系列基于学校的多成分和单一成分项目对日常水果和蔬菜摄入量的影响。目的:本研究的目的是量化学校干预措施对5-12岁儿童水果和蔬菜摄入量的影响。设计:进行了系统的文献综述,以识别基于小学的随机和非随机对照试验,这些试验旨在增加每日水果和蔬菜摄入量。检索1985年至2009年的MEDLINE,Cochrane库,EMBASE,Psyc-INFO和教育信息中心。提取数据,并使用随机效应模型计算平均效应大小。结果:总共确定了27个学校课程,涉及26,361名儿童,符合入选标准,并评估了每天摄入的水果和蔬菜的总重量,仅水果的摄入量或仅蔬菜的摄入量,并进行了21项荟萃分析。荟萃分析的结果表明,如果排除果汁,则水果和蔬菜的每日摄入量将增加0.25份(95%CI:0.06,0.43份),增加0.32份(95%CI:0.14,0.50份)如果包括果汁。改善主要是由于水果消费量的增加,而不是蔬菜消费量的增加。水果(不包括果汁)和蔬菜的荟萃分析结果分别表明分别提高了0.24份(95%CI:0.05,0.43份)和0.07份(95%CI:-0.03,0.16份)。结论:以学校为基础的干预措施可适度改善水果摄入量,但对蔬菜摄入量的影响最小。需要进行其他研究来解决成功改变饮食行为(尤其是与蔬菜有关)的障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号