Documenting the value of care for rheumatoid arthritis, analogous to hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia: Is control of individual patient self-report measures of global estimate and physical function more valuable than laboratory tests, radiographs, indices, or remission criteria?

摘要

Recent recommendations for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include "treat-to-target" with a "primary target...a state of clinical remission"1. Remission is now a realistic target in RA, because patient status is substantially better than in previous decades in most developed countries2. Capacity to induce remission may be an effective rationale for support of aggressive treatment with expensive therapies to insurance company and government payers.The concept of "treat-to-target" was developed over the years in other chronic diseases, notably hypertension, diabetes5, and hyperlipidemia. The basis of treat-to-target was not "remission," a state that may often be possible, but as in RA, usually requires continued Lifelong medication. The target, in other diseases, involves "tight control" of a "gold standard" biomarker of dysregulation - elevated blood pressure, serum glucose, or serum cholesterol - to a lower level that results in improved quality of life and reduction of premature mortality rates; Such a target - not a state of remission - provides a strong rationale for aggressive treatment.