首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Medical Research Council randomised trial of endometrial resection versus hysterectomy in management of menorrhagia.
【24h】

Medical Research Council randomised trial of endometrial resection versus hysterectomy in management of menorrhagia.

机译:医学研究理事会进行子宫内膜切除与子宫切除术治疗月经过多的随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The most frequent indication for hysterectomy is menorrhagia, even though the uterus is normal in a large number of patients. Transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) is a less drastic alternative, but success rates have varied and menorrhagia can recur. We have tested the hypothesis that the difference in the proportion of women dissatisfied and requiring further surgery within 3 years of TCRE or hysterectomy would be no more than 15%. METHODS: 202 women with symptomatic menorrhagia were recruited to a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial to compare the two interventions. TCRE and hysterectomy were randomly assigned in a ratio of two to one. The primary endpoints were women's satisfaction and need for further surgery. The patients' psychological and social states were monitored before surgery, then annually with a questionnaire. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Data were available for 172 women (56 hysterectomy, 116 TCRE); 26 withdrew before surgery and four werelost to follow-up. Satisfaction scores were higher for hysterectomy than for TCRE throughout follow-up (median 2 years), but the differences were not significant (at 3 years 27 [96%] of 28 in hysterectomy group vs 46 [85%] of 54 in TCRE group were satisfied; p = 0.16). 25 (22%) women in the TCRE group and five (9%) in the hysterectomy group required further surgery (relative risk 0.46 [95% CI 0.2-1.1], p = 0.053). TCRE had the benefits of shorter operating time, fewer complications, and faster rates of recovery. INTERPRETATION: TCRE is an acceptable alternative to hysterectomy in the treatment of menorrhagia for many women with no other serious disorders.
机译:背景:即使许多患者子宫正常,子宫切除术最常见的指征是月经过多。经子宫内膜切除术(TCRE)是一种不太剧烈的选择,但是成功率各不相同,月经过多也可以复发。我们已经验证了以下假设:在TCRE或子宫切除术的3年内,不满意并需要进一步手术的女性比例差异不超过15%。方法:招募了202名有症状月经过多的妇女参加一项多中心,随机,对照试验,以比较这两种干预措施。 TCRE和子宫切除术以2比1的比例随机分配。主要终点是妇女的满意度和进一步手术的需要。术前对患者的心理和社交状态进行监测,然后每年进行一次问卷调查。分析是按意向进行的。结果:有172名妇女的数据(56例子宫切除术,116例TCRE); 26名在手术前退出,有4名失去了随访。在整个随访过程中(中位2年)子宫切除术的满意度得分均高于TCRE,但差异不显着(3年时子宫切除术组28的27 [96%] vs TCRE组54的46 [85%])满足; p = 0.16)。 TCRE组中有25名(22%)妇女,子宫切除组中有5名(9%)需要进一步手术(相对危险度0.46 [95%CI 0.2-1.1],p = 0.053)。 TCRE具有缩短手术时间,减少并发症和恢复速度更快的优势。解释:对于许多没有其他严重疾病的妇女,TCRE是子宫切除术在月经过多治疗中的一种可接受的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号