首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology >A randomised trial of endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding: outcome at four years. Aberdeen Endometrial Ablation Trials Group.
【24h】

A randomised trial of endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding: outcome at four years. Aberdeen Endometrial Ablation Trials Group.

机译:子宫内膜切除术与子宫切除术治疗功能失调性子宫出血的随机试验:四年结局。阿伯丁子宫内膜消融试验组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long term impact of initial management by endometrial ablation for women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding who would otherwise have had a hysterectomy. DESIGN: Long term follow up of randomised cohorts of women. SETTING: Gynaecology department of a large teaching hospital. SAMPLE: Two hundred and four women who had joined a randomised comparison of endometrial ablation with hysterectomy, 4 to 5.6 years previously. METHODS: Postal questionnaire and casenote review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's satisfaction with treatment, gynaecological symptoms and psychological outcomes at four years; further surgical treatment and differential resource use at a minimum of four years' follow up. RESULTS: Further surgical treatment was received by 39 (38%) women randomised to endometrial ablation, including six women who each had two additional treatments. At four years, the probability of receiving further surgical treatment by any method was 36% and by hysterectomy was 24% (compared with 29% and 14% respectively at one year). Satisfaction rates were high (80% ablation group vs 89% hysterectomy group), the difference reflecting re-treatment. Premenstrual symptoms improved over time but more so in the hysterectomy group, who also rated their improvements in general health higher. The estimated overall mean cost of the endometrial ablation group is 93% of that of the hysterectomy group (pound sterling 1231 vs pound sterling 1332). CONCLUSIONS: While about two out of every five women allocated to endometrial ablation eventually received further surgical treatment, hysterectomy with its associated morbidity was still avoided by 76% of women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding who would otherwise have had a hysterectomy. At four years, the difference in the costs of endometrial ablation and hysterectomy policies had narrowed.
机译:目的:评估子宫内膜切除术对子宫功能失调妇女的子宫内膜切除术的长期治疗的长期影响。设计:对妇女随机分组的长期随访。地点:一家大型教学医院的妇科。样本:244年前加入子宫内膜切除术与子宫切除术的随机对照的204名妇女。方法:邮政调查表和案例笔记审查。主要观察指标:四年时妇女对治疗,妇科症状和心理结局的满意度;至少四年的随访中进一步进行外科手术治疗并使用不同的资源。结果:随机接受子宫内膜切除术的39名妇女(38%)接受了进一步的手术治疗,其中包括6名妇女,每名妇女另外接受了两次额外的治疗。四年后,通过任何方法接受进一步手术治疗的可能性为36%,通过子宫切除术的可能性为24%(而一年时分别为29%和14%)。满意率很高(消融组80%与子宫切除组89%),差异反映了再次治疗。经期症状会随着时间的推移而改善,但是子宫切除术组的情况尤其如此,他们对整体健康的改善也更高。子宫内膜切除术组的估计总体平均成本是子宫切除术组的93%(英镑1231 vs英镑1332)。结论:尽管每5名女性中有2名最终接受了子宫内膜切除术,但仍接受了外科手术治疗,但仍有76%子宫功能失调的女性避免了子宫切除术及其相关的发病率,这些妇女本应进行子宫切除术。四年来,子宫内膜切除术和子宫切除术的费用差异已经缩小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号