首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of serious coronary heart disease: an observational cohort study.
【24h】

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of serious coronary heart disease: an observational cohort study.

机译:非甾体类抗炎药和严重冠心病的风险:一项观察性队列研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Non-aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NANSAIDs) have complex effects that could either prevent or promote coronary heart disease. Comparison of the NANSAID rofexocib with naproxen showed a substantial difference in acute myocardial infarction risk, which has been interpreted as a protective effect of naproxen. We did an observational study to measure the effects of NANSAIDs, including naproxen, on risk of serious coronary heart disease. METHODS: We used data from the Tennessee Medicaid programme obtained between Jan 1, 1987, and Dec 31, 1998, to identify a cohort of new NANSAID users (n=181 441) and an equal number of non-users, matched for age, sex, and date NANSAID use began. Both groups were 50-84 years of age, were not resident in a nursing home, and did not have life-threatening illness. The study endpoint was hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction or death from coronary heart disease. FINDINGS: During 532634 person-years of follow-up, 6362 cases of serious coronary heart disease occurred, or 11.9 per 1000 person-years. Multivariate-adjusted rate ratios for current and former use of NANSAIDs were 1.05 (95% CI 0.97-1.14) and 1.02 (0.97-1.08), respectively. Rate ratios for naproxen, ibuprofen, and other NANSAIDs were 0.95 (0.82-1.09), 1.15 (1.02-1.28), and 1.03 (0.92-1.16), respectively. There was no protection among long-term NANSAID users with uninterrupted use; the rate ratio among current users with more than 60 days of continuous use was 1.05 (0.91-1.21). When naproxen was directly compared with ibuprofen, the current-use rate ratio was 0.83 (0.69-0.98). INTERPRETATION: Absence of a protective effect of naproxen or other NANSAIDs on risk of coronary heart disease suggests that these drugs should not be used for cardioprotection.
机译:背景:非阿司匹林,非甾体类抗炎药(NANSAIDs)具有复杂的作用,可以预防或促进冠心病。 NANSAID罗非昔布与萘普生的比较显示急性心肌梗塞风险有显着差异,这被解释为萘普生的保护作用。我们进行了一项观察性研究,以测量包括萘普生在内的NANSAIDs对严重冠心病风险的影响。方法:我们使用了1987年1月1日至1998年12月31日期间获得的田纳西州医疗补助计划数据,来确定一组新的NANSAID用户(n = 181 441)和相同数量的非用户,并与年龄相匹配,性别和开始使用NANSAID的日期。两组年龄均在50-84岁之间,没有居住在疗养院,也没有危及生命的疾病。研究终点是因急性心肌梗塞或冠心病死亡而入院。研究结果:在532634人-年的随访中,发生了6362例严重的冠心病病例,即每1000人-年有11.9例。当前和以前使用NANSAID的多变量调整比率分别为1.05(95%CI 0.97-1.14)和1.02(0.97-1.08)。萘普生,布洛芬和其他NANSAIDs的比率分别为0.95(0.82-1.09),1.15(1.02-1.28)和1.03(0.92-1.16)。长期使用不间断的NANSAID用户没有任何保护;连续使用超过60天的当前用户比率为1.05(0.91-1.21)。将萘普生与布洛芬直接比较时,当前的使用比率为0.83(0.69-0.98)。解释:萘普生或其他NANSAIDs对冠心病风险的保护作用缺乏,表明这些药物不应用于心脏保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号