首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.
【24h】

Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.

机译:重症患者的强化血糖控制与常规血糖控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: The optimal target range for blood glucose in critically ill patients remains unclear. METHODS: Within 24 hours after admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), adults who were expected to require treatment in the ICU on 3 or more consecutive days were randomly assigned to undergo either intensive glucose control, with a target blood glucose range of 81 to 108 mg per deciliter (4.5 to 6.0 mmol per liter), or conventional glucose control, with a target of 180 mg or less per deciliter (10.0 mmol or less per liter). We defined the primary end point as death from any cause within 90 days after randomization. RESULTS: Of the 6104 patients who underwent randomization, 3054 were assigned to undergo intensive control and 3050 to undergo conventional control; data with regard to the primary outcome at day 90 were available for 3010 and 3012 patients, respectively. The two groups had similar characteristics at baseline. A total of 829 patients (27.5%) in the intensive-control group and 751 (24.9%) inthe conventional-control group died (odds ratio for intensive control, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.28; P=0.02). The treatment effect did not differ significantly between operative (surgical) patients and nonoperative (medical) patients (odds ratio for death in the intensive-control group, 1.31 and 1.07, respectively; P=0.10). Severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose level, < or = 40 mg per deciliter [2.2 mmol per liter]) was reported in 206 of 3016 patients (6.8%) in the intensive-control group and 15 of 3014 (0.5%) in the conventional-control group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in the median number of days in the ICU (P=0.84) or hospital (P=0.86) or the median number of days of mechanical ventilation (P=0.56) or renal-replacement therapy (P=0.39). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, international, randomized trial, we found that intensive glucose control increased mortality among adults in the ICU: a blood glucose target of 180 mg or less per deciliter resulted in lower mortality than did a target of 81 to 108 mg per deciliter. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00220987.)
机译:背景:危重患者血糖的最佳目标范围仍不清楚。方法:重症监护病房(ICU)入院后24小时内,将预期连续3天或以上需要在ICU中接受治疗的成年人随机分配至强化血糖控制,目标血糖范围为81每分升108 mg(每升4.5至6.0 mmol)或常规葡萄糖控制,每分升180 mg或更低(每升10.0 mmol或更低)。我们将主要终点定义为随机分组后90天内因任何原因死亡。结果:在6104名接受随机分组的患者中,有3054名被指定接受强化控制,而3050名则被接受常规控制。第90天的主要结局数据分别可用于3010和3012患者。两组在基线时具有相似的特征。强化控制组共829例患者(27.5%)死亡,常规对照组共751例(24.9%)死亡(强化控制的优势比为1.14;置信区间为95%,1.02至1.28; P = 0.02)。手术(手术)患者和非手术(医学)患者的治疗效果无明显差异(强化对照组的死亡几率分别为1.31和1.07; P = 0.10)。在常规对照组中,有30例患者中有206例(206%(6.8%))出现严重的低血糖症(血糖水平≤40 mg /分升[2.2 mmol / L]),而3014例中有15例(0.5%)对照组(P <0.001)。两组的ICU(P = 0.84)或医院(P = 0.86)或机械通气(P = 0.56)或肾脏替代治疗的中位数天数之间无显着差异(P = 0.39)。结论:在这项大型的国际随机试验中,我们发现强化的血糖控制可提高ICU成人的死亡率:目标血糖为每分升180 mg或更低可导致死亡率低于目标目标为81至108 mg分升。 (ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT00220987。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号