...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Prehospital intubation in severe thoracic trauma without respiratory insufficiency: a matched-pair analysis based on the Trauma Registry of the German Trauma Society.
【24h】

Prehospital intubation in severe thoracic trauma without respiratory insufficiency: a matched-pair analysis based on the Trauma Registry of the German Trauma Society.

机译:重度胸外伤住院前气管插管,无呼吸功能不全:基于德国创伤学会创伤登记处的配对分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: On the basis of the data of a multicenter study, the impact of prehospital intubation and ventilation in the therapy of severe thoracic trauma without manifest respiratory insufficiency was analyzed. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively in the Trauma Registry of the German Trauma Society. In a matched-pair analysis, patients with severe thoracic trauma (Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 4) with and without prehospital intubation were compared. Patients were paired with respect to age, injury severity, and prognosis (according to the TRISS method). RESULTS: From a total of 3,814 patients, two groups (with/without prehospital intubation) of 44 matched patients each with comparable average age (36 vs. 36 years), Injury Severity Score (29 vs. 29), and TRISS (95.2 vs. 95.3) were identified. No patient was unconscious at the scene (all Glasgow Coma Scale scores > or = 8) or presented with severe respiratory insufficiency (all > or = 10 breaths/min). Time between injury and hospital admission was significantly longer (73 minutes; p < 0.05) in the group with prehospital intubation compared with the nonintubated group (47 minutes). Furthermore, fluid requirements in the prehospital period were significantly higher in the intubated patients (3,000 mL vs. 1,000 mL). In the prehospital intubation group, the number of patients with mass transfusion (9 vs. 4) as well as with emergency operations (10 vs. 4) were not significantly different from the nonintubated group. The prehospital intubation group showed a similar incidence of lung failure (17 vs. 14), kidney failure (6 vs. 2), and circulation failure (13 vs. 5). Except for two of the primarily nonintubated patients, all were intubated during their stay in the emergency room or on the intensive care unit. Days of ventilation (median, 7 days) as well as the length of stay on the ICU (median, 11 days) were comparable in both groups. Mortality in the prehospital intubation group was not significantly different between groups (six vs. two deceased). CONCLUSION: Prognosis with respect to organ failure, treatment time, and mortality is not adversely affected in the German trauma system, if patients with severe thoracic trauma without manifest respiratory insufficiency and without other indications for intubation are not treated with prehospital intubation.
机译:目的:基于一项多中心研究的数据,分析了院前插管和通气对没有明显呼吸功能不全的严重胸外伤的治疗效果。方法:前瞻性地在德国创伤学会的创伤登记处收集数据。在配对分析中,比较了有和没有院前插管的严重胸外伤(缩写为4分)的患者。根据年龄,损伤严重程度和预后对患者进行配对(根据TRISS方法)。结果:在总共3,814名患者中,两组(有/无院前插管)的44名匹配患者均具有相当的平均年龄(36岁对36岁),损伤严重度评分(29对29岁)和TRISS(95.2对(95.3)。没有患者在现场昏迷(所有格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分均≥8)或出现严重的呼吸功能不全(≥10次/ min)。与非插管组相比,院前插管组受伤与住院之间的时间明显更长(73分钟; p <0.05)。此外,插管患者在院前期的液体需求量显着更高(3,000 mL对1,000 mL)。在院前插管组中,接受大容量输血(9对4)和急诊手术(10对4)的患者与未进行插管的患者无明显差异。院前插管组的肺衰竭(17 vs. 14),肾衰竭(6 vs. 2)和血液循环衰竭(13 vs. 5)的发生率相似。除两名主要未插管的患者外,所有患者在急诊室或重症监护病房期间均已插管。两组的通气天数(中位数为7天)以及在ICU的停留时间(中位数为11天)均相当。院前插管组的死亡率在两组之间没有显着差异(六例与二例死者)。结论:如果没有明显的呼吸功能不全且无其他插管适应症的严重胸外伤患者不接受院前插管治疗,则在德国创伤系统中,器官衰竭,治疗时间和死亡率的预后不会受到不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号