...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >One hundred patients with the HeartMate left ventricular assist device: evolving concepts and technology.
【24h】

One hundred patients with the HeartMate left ventricular assist device: evolving concepts and technology.

机译:一百名使用HeartMate左心室辅助设备的患者:不断发展的概念和技术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Implantable left ventricular assist devices are common as a bridge to transplantation but are just reaching their goal as an alternative to transplantation. METHODS: From December 1991 until December 1996, 97 left ventricular assist devices were implanted as a bridge to transplantation, one as an alternative to transplantation, and two as a bridge to recovery. Included were 64 pneumatic devices and 36 electric devices. Most patients (69%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy and most (53%) had had previous cardiac surgery. Preoperative circulatory support (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) was used in 25. RESULTS: Perioperative insertion of a right ventricular assist device was unusual (11%). The mean duration of support with a left ventricular assist device (bridge to transplantation) was 70 +/- 41 days (up to 206 days). Survival to transplantation was 76%. Cause of death included multiple organ failure (n = 13), perioperative stroke (n = 5), device failure (n = 5), and controller disconnect (n = 1). Significant risk factors for death included (1) preoperative need for ventilator or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, (2) elevated blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, or bilirubin, and (3) low pulmonary artery pressures. Risks after insertion of the left ventricular assist device were reoperation for bleeding, support with a right ventricular assist device, dialysis, or device failure. Catastrophic failure of the device occurred 14 times in 12 patients and was treated by emergency pump exchange in six instances. Only two device-related thromboembolic episodes were detected. Positive blood cultures were found in 59% of patients, driveline infection in 28%, and pump infection in 11%. CONCLUSIONS: The HeartMate device provided excellent hemodynamic support with low device-related thromboembolic events. Infection and reliability of the device contributed to the high cost of therapy. These areas need to be improved for the left ventricular assist device to attain its goal as a viable alternative to transplantation.
机译:背景:植入式左心室辅助装置通常作为移植的桥梁,但作为移植的替代品正达到其目标。方法:从1991年12月至1996年12月,植入了97台左心室辅助装置,作为移植的桥梁,一种替代移植,另外两种则用于恢复。其中包括64台气动设备和36台电气设备。大多数患者(69%)患有缺血性心肌病,大多数(53%)曾接受过心脏手术。 25例患者术前使用了循环系统支持(体外膜氧合)。结果:围手术期右心室辅助装置的插入非常少见(11%)。左心室辅助装置(桥接至移植)的平均支持时间为70 +/- 41天(最多206天)。移植存活率为76%。死亡原因包括多器官功能衰竭(n = 13),围手术期中风(n = 5),设备故障(n = 5)和控制器断开(n = 1)。死亡的重要危险因素包括:(1)术前需要呼吸机或体外膜氧合;(2)血尿素氮,肌酐或胆红素升高;(3)肺动脉压低。插入左心室辅助设备后的风险是再次手术出血,右心室辅助设备的支撑,透析或设备故障。该装置的灾难性故障在12例患者中发生了14次,并在六例中通过紧急更换泵进行了治疗。仅检测到两个与设备有关的血栓栓塞发作。在59%的患者中发现了阳性血培养,在传动系统中感染了28%,在泵中感染了11%。结论:HeartMate设备提供了出色的血液动力学支持,并减少了与设备相关的血栓栓塞事件。该设备的感染和可靠性导致了高昂的治疗费用。这些区域需要改进,以使左心室辅助设备达到其目标,成为可行的移植替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号